Check it out here lol.
User talk:Masson Thief
Jump to navigation Jump to search
I made a blog of a fake movie lol
Great work. Imagine if an article like that actually existed.
Well, sometimes they almost did. Anyway, pointer 2 never existed on our wikis and it is rather forced, I see that was a pretty personal thing No Face wanted to write.
The page is supposed to be bad though.
Sure it is.
I also made this here:
That's actually a pretty good parody of the worse kinds of articles.
Some pointers really are an accurate parody.
I hate to interrupt, but look who's back! :(
Masson, we need a serious talk, this is something very urgent. I edited The Last Airbender, while LA2002 added a bold text, and No Face undo our edits, AND HIS UNDO'S REASON IS TOLD US TO F*CK OFF ABOUT THE BOLDS TEXTS! :(
Okay, so I have a good reason to undo LA2002's edits because they are completely unnecessary to the page. Plus, adding bold text to unnecessary parts to pages is extremely immature and makes us look like whiny 10-year-old kids.
Although I admit, I should've had a better edit summary instead of simply saying "Fuck off", I apologize for that. But still, he shouldn't have added bold text to unnecessary parts to pages.
Right, bold text isn't to be added in the pages. But writing an edit summary like that is block-worthy, I don't think you are unaware of this.
Really. This is a warning. Don't do that ever again.
Is it me, or No Face?
Se's banned and an annoucment.
Since Se is banned from your territory, I hope he'll never be like an IHateShippers user, like he did back in the last few months.
Also, I decided that I have no plans to do any Star Wars movies, anytime soon. Instead, I'll be a while until we get another Star Wars movie in the future, and IDK if it's going to be good or not, I'll be doing Star Wars games instead, long before TFA, is annouced, and with of course, Lego Star Wars: The Force Awakens, and other LucasArt's Star Wars games on AGW as long they're good, and decent.
Hope you're happy about it, Theif.
Instead, I'm might going to do. film with Library of Congress on it soon enough.
I told Se not to create socks or else his position will just become worse. What he wrote can't be forgiven easily.
Yours are good projects and I claim Star Wars games are generally good, except for the nes one perhaps.
Okay, No NES ones. NES Star Wars are very crappier.
BTWM If you didn't hear my annoucement: Look here about before 2020 starts.
I think there is only one NES/Famicom Star Wars game, there is Darth Vader transforming into a giant scorpion in it as well as some weird graphics and clumsy controls.
There was another one for the US. That didn’t have Scorpion Vader.
Ah yes. I remember the movie where Darth Vader turns into a scorpion. That was my favorite movie. (I'm joking)
Obviously. Dud you also play the game?
Who's Se? What's his username again?
Se (or Seunghwan Lee)
Se is, well... a user who causes a lot of drama on every Reception Wikis family, including Atrocious YouTubers Wiki, and he is from South Korea, I guess,
Se has been acting very differently when we where at Mar9122's territory. and Se made a forum out of Vicious187 on Reception Flames Wars Wiki (Now got shut down), and made Vic ban a lot of accounts, like Mar9122, Seanbuscus2600, RoboticJeffy, except me, because of Se's fourm in July, 2019. I really don't like when he's the way to act.
He is a Korea-American immature, screaming, and NEVER shuts up, and keeps trying to apologize, and he throw fits, across the wikis, which it makes even worse, especially, this.
He never shuts up about getting block and he keeps sayign "HEY, PLEASE!!! I'M SO SORRY!!! I WANT A SECOND CHANCE!!! :'(" And keeps going it over and over and over again.
Yeah. He seriously needs to be blocked from editing his talk page.
I think I'll make a new year page on this wiki.
So we can celebrate 2020. That's it.
Here's what I like/dislikes about The Force Awakens
Hey, It's not about TLJ or TROS or whatever but...
Despite being the average movie The Force Awakens, which I admittley like it and it's my favorite average film, and here's what i like and dislike about the film and my thoughts.
What I Like about it
- Lots of awesome adventure scenes, including the space battles.
- The soundtrack is pretty great!
- The action scenes looking great!
- Han Solo is back, but sadly he died.
- The scene where Kylo Ren go full of anger is pretty amusingly funny.
What I Dislike about it
- Poor Han Solo.... :'(
- The film feels a little short, there could've been more into it.
- Kylo Ren.
What do you think?
Even if I never watched a Star Wars movie, I was unpleased by Han Solo's death for some reason.
Honestly the only (somewhat) good film in the sequel trilogy.
I agree with you Sean.
I too think he is right. Even if I didn't watch them I don't see much complaining about it, not as much as the other two.
I can't move pages on this wiki!!! Please help!!! :((((((((((((((
Woah, chill out. Now it has been fixed.
It kinda bothers me how this is the same thing with the other wikis, except for TTVS and ow here.
It's because trolls usually rename pages of our wikis, but limiting the ability to the autoconfirmed users group will prevent it from happening again.
That's what I meant, allowing autoconfirmed users to move pages. Also, autoconfirmed users can't upload new versions of files on AGW. For example, on the Spider-Man 2: Enter Electro page, I had to upload a new image, and this kind of stuff is just really annoying, especially if someone finds a higher quality image for a page, like me.
It's been now a lot a months and almost a year since Pixels page was deleted, because of the pointers were untrue and others are nitpicky and opinionated, But, maybe I'll find the way to make it more true than being untrue, so, I'm made a sandbox of Pixels, also, I told everyone that to read the disclaimer before they can edit, without the nitpicks, rants, or fake reasons.
Good. If the reasons don’t go well, that’s it for that page!
You can try but I honestly doubt a convincing page can be made for this wiki. I think the movie is hated rather than criticized, and just because there is Adam Sandler in it. I watched the movie myself and found out the things people say about that movie are fake.
I find it a guilty pleasure of mine.
To me it was decent entertainment but pretty vulgar here and there. If it will be readded here it will be in the average category. Also the multiple references to retro games are very good.
Can I add the comment section on TLJ?
Uhm. Let's try. But they will be removed if flame wars will happen there.
And the good news is, Since you gave me a content moderator, I can delete any comments if drama happen.
Also, Today, they're no drama comments while you're gone! :D
I saw it. Maybe everyone realizes a movie being on this wiki is not a problem.
Glad to hear that! :)
Let's be Careful in this comment.
Exactly. I will add comments now, and then go away for the night. I will see the results tomorrow.
Allright, comments are working. Goodnight.
Goodnight, Twilight Sparkle is putting you in bed.
Is my TLJ sandbox ready?
A few months ago I've told you that I was working on my own sandbox for Star Wars: The Last Jedi and asked you about your thoughts on said sandbox, and that you mentioned you will be reviewing it when you're not busy. I've worked extremely hard on the sandbox, adding in pointers consisting of poor writing, atrocious characterization, inconsistencies, plot holes, pointless moments, scenes copied from other films, and other movie-making problems.
And now, I feel that my proposed page for The Last Jedi might be ready, especially with The Rise of Skywalker coming up in more than a week as of writing this. I have one question to ask you: do you think that the sandbox is ready to be turned into a full page on the Awful Movies Wiki? ',:)
There's still a lot of it that feels like attempts to pad out the list of negatives for the sake of padding it, some pointers still read like opinions.
And regardless it was still agreed to not make a page on either wiki.
"There's still a lot of it that feels like attempts to pad out the list of negatives for the sake of padding it, some pointers still read like opinions."
Okay, okay... *deletes some Main Pointers™ while changing two of the other ones into Side Pointers™*
DELETED COMMENT (my comment was having a "timeout", so I tried to post it again repeatedly)
There have been several times where I see users go out of their way to try to make an article's number of pointers bigger, but bigger isn't always better, more often than not they end up putting nitpicks, opinions, repeat the same point with slightly different wording, and smaller things that aren't that relevant or important for the sake of making that number larger and it just makes the page worse.
That pretty much describes Evil Tim's sandbox page in a nutshell (plus beating around the bush with some pointers).
Add the mocking tone and repeated name calling.
With some “gems”:
- “and so after wasting time on a moronic little "comedy" skit during which the Star Destroyers don't shoot the man who just destroyed Starkiller Base, ace pilot Poe Dameron and his toy robot BB-8 take out the surface cannons on the Dreadnought”
- ”Then the credits roll and you wonder if you can get your money back.”
- “Rian Johnson forgetting most of the enemy force actually exists is going to be a recurring theme, by the way.”
- “Biggestest Star Destroyer Evar™“ (my personal favorite)
- On the TFA side: “The movie fuelled questioning as to whether J J Abrams knows any way of raising the stakes in a sci-fi movie short of blowing up one or more planets.”
Tim’s sandboxes are like treasure chests, except that instead of treasure there’s failed attempts at comedy mocking.
But isn't "fuelled" a real word? I wonder why Evil Tim wrote "sic" after it.
I put that there because I assumed it was a typo.
Ah. Maybe it is not a very used word, it looks like a pretty refined term, it is the first time I heard of it.
There’s only one “l” in the word usually.
About that, I am noticing the comedy mocking is pretty much limited to the plot section, the rest of the page only had a few.
Anyway, let us not waste time making fun of an already mocking piece of text. I was actually going to ask you if you could write a plot section for the page, it doesn't have to be extremely long and mentioning every event of the movie.
"I was actually going to ask you if you could write a plot section for the page, it doesn't have to be extremely long and mentioning every event of the movie."
Already taken care of.
Where is it?
Right, it's in the sandbox.I wonder why I didn't think of it.
It should not be mocked but it is a good example (if a bit extreme) of why users getting opinionated when writing articles is a bad practice that results in poor quality articles.
Not a very good example, he also wrote that some elements from the movie are excellent and top-notch. Not exactly the behaviour of a hater, there is worst stuff you can find on the internet. Also, the plot is the part of the page which suffers the most from the comedy tone, the rest is sort of allright but still redundant in some parts, with some nitpicks and mocking.
The positives in that page weren't nearly as much as the negatives, which were stretched out as much as possible to make the list longer and several of them weren't exactly written in a civil manner either which is my main point, and that's not even the mocking points.
What I am trying to say is that the presence of positives written right makes the page not a complete hater rant. And about the positives, my current version of the page has ten of them, including Porgs.
"repeat the same point with slightly different wording"
It's one of the main reasons why I put some of the main pointers as side pointers. For example, I've put in the pointer of "pointless lines that tell us how we should react etc." under the Canto Bight one. Speaking of pointless moments, I've just made a main pointer talking about pointless moments, listing Canto Bight and said lines of dialogue.
That was Sausage Party, TyrantRex. For TLJ and TFA I said we were going to respect the deal we had with Evil Tim. but now I doubt he will ever come back so I decided. Both movies will be as average movies here because non toxic SW estimators too regard them as weak installements of the franchise. It doesn't convince me to forbid something because a very toxic portion of the fanbase hates it, nor is the average viewer liking it a good reason to prevent the pages from being on this wiki since lore and characterizations are important in movie series and the average viewer isn't able to complain about them due to not knowing much about them.
I must also point out how previous attempts at having these movies on the sister wiki resulted in very weak pages. Both sandboxes have potential in a decent amount of pointers and I am confident we will be able to make a good TLJ article here.
Trevor, who likes TLJ, helped with the sandbox in the recent months and that's another reason why we can have the movie here. Plus, I am dying to polish pages again after several weeks of semi-activity.
Also, Lego Star Wars: The Force Awakens was also well receieved by the gamers, and the fans.
Well, that is an another thing despite being based on the movie. That can go to Awesome Games Wiki if that's what you are asking. It wouldn't be the first time a LEGO video game is more entertaining than the movie it is based on. I heard at least one person claiming Lego Pirates of the Carribean made some boring scenes from the movies more entertaining and I am sure someone would say the same about The Lost World and Jurassic Park III.
In either case the sandbox still needs more cleanup so it doesn't come off as a fan rant. I'm not convinced at all that 28 whole pointers would be something a regular non diehard Star Wars fan would put.
"I'm not convinced at all that 28 whole pointers would be something a regular non diehard Star Wars fan would put."
To me a bunch of pointers on those pages could be merged or made into sub-pointers, as they're either not that much of an issue or a part of a bigger problem.
They also need to be condensed so they don't end up being large paragraphs.
I am confident I can make the article work from an understandable point of view.
I won't edit the sandbox though. I will work on it off-line first in a text file and then it will be uploaded here. Not sure if I will protect it as soon as uploaded, though. Maybe I will.
So, you're saying pages in general here should be short?
Pages just have to avoid containing walls of text while not being undetailed at the same time. It is pretty hard to manage to do such a thing, harder than most people realize.
But at the same time they need to be civil and not sound like an opinionated rant, something that many users tend to do, not just when they put obnoxious bold red capital letters, but also in the way they word their pointers. Users going out of their way to make pages longer because they dislike the movie/game/show in question is also a bad practice
I'm really sorry to tell you but......even though The Force Awakens, (I'm not saying about the fans) Is actually liked by a lot of people, While it was not hated by the audiences, It had a 6.8/10 user score rating, It was still favorable reviews from the audiences, and by the time it was released, on Rotten Tomatoes, It had a 86% rating on Audience score, But sure, Despite the flaws, Back on FANDOM, The Force Awakens was on Greatest Movies Wiki back on FANDOM before the SJW happened on our wikis and closed down back in 2018, I've saw it. I'm not going to lie.
But sure, Despite the flaws, A lot of audeinces including Me, I had enjoyed TFA, But not TLJ. I'm pretty concerned in this wiki right now.
Oh dear dear... I'm really nervous-worried right now. :(
And you mean, "But now I doubt that if he will ever come back"?
I found TLJ meh at best.
He probably means Evil Tim will not come back to these wikias.
Right. At this point he won't return.
Actually, I checked his FANDOM activity out of curiousity and noticed he had breaks from wikis which were even several years long, so who knows, it is still possible he will come back to our wikis.
Just because something has been recieved well, doesn't mean that it's actually good. Examples of bad movies with good critic ratings include Leaving Neverland and The Last Jedi. Same with LCW, though he has a good reputation, he's actually a bad character.
The more you think about something (e.g. a movie, character, song, etc.), you'll see how good/bad it actually is.
I was talking about the audiences, not the critics.
That's what I meant to say.
Um, even though it had a 6.8/10 score, the thing is, it’s gotten more negative reception in recent years after TLJ.
But that's pretty old news man.
I get that you like it (and trust me, so do I), but the thing is, it’s a minority.
What is sure about these two movies is that they are very divisive amongst viewers, and that's what the average category is for. Unnamedgoon also agreed in adding them while he was an admin here, too.
@Masson Thief When do you expect the page to be ready to be posted onto this wiki?
I already re-elaborated a half of the page yesterday, I still have to review and edit the rest. Overall the page is pretty bulky but I don't feel like removing a lot of pointers since I am afraid we could dismiss criticism.
About the die-hard fan pointers which have been discussed, I condensed them, removed redundant parts or created sub-pointers. Someone could argue that only a die-hard Star Wars fan could list errors in the ships or space physics and while that could be true, I think it wouldn't be right to ignore this criticism only because the average viewer probably doesn't care about them.
Not only we can't be sure of it, but I believe that since Star Wars is also sci fi, the technology and physics must always be credible, I am pretty sure that's how the franchise is supposed to work.
I think the page will be uploaded near the end of this week or Monday at worst. In the meantime you and Trevor should try to come up with some good qualities for the page.
"In the meantime you and Trevor should try to come up with some good qualities for the page."
sigh Maybe some. However, I'm going to be on Christmas break, and my family has banned me from the computer at home (if you didn't know, I use a computer at school, and those are two main reasons why I've stopped editing on the weekends for now). Have a good Christmas break, Masson Thief...
EDIT: My family has now unbanned me from the computer at home, but I'm still going to be a little busy.
I doubt I will have a Christmas break from the wikis but thanks.
One other thing, inconcistencies in this movie and between this movie and the prequel have been noted pretty much everywhere on the internet. This is an important flaw in movies and the page has a lot of material about them. Can't remove this type of criticism from the page due to how meaningful it is.
Speaking of Star Wars: The Last Jedi or Evil Tim, Have you seen Paranormal Activity? Why did i say that?
Well, It seems like that you had seen the film. You said that Paranormal Activity is very cheap and poorly made, how can it not belong to this wiki. It is right to have it back here, and you said that the page only needs some tweaks to remove some ranting.
Guess what? I think I editied the diffrent, by removing the rant style words.
Unfortuantley, If I readded it here, Eiji will attack me for this! :(
You already edited it? Is your version in your sandbox? I am eager to review it. I don't think he would attack you, but in any case I will upload it. I am attack-proofed.
Look here, I copied it from the page, and you can see what Eiji said before I editi the WIS.
I can't see anything written by Eiji on that page.
Anyway, after further fixes the page is ready and uploaded. Eiji will have to accept it, this movie is far from being great and the reception from critics is not consistent since they are known to like things just because yes. This is another case of critics liking something only because of its peculiar nature rather than because of its qualities; like it is a freakshow.