Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Not editable

Thenabster126 (talkcontribs)

None of the reasons provided are backed up, the film was critically acclaimed and doesn’t criticize filmmaking techniques

Collin from DOAWK (talkcontribs)

is it just me or some low IQ activist never paid attention that it was SeaWorld fault when it's actually Sealand of the Pacific for the abuse who first started it

Offensive article to the animal rights movement.

Summary by EijiZeBoi

Read the article before acting all asshurt.

Almultimavenger (talkcontribs)

I find it inappropriate that a documentary of exploitation of animals for entertainment has to be portrayed as "awful". That's the world used for the conditions animals in circuses and cruel zoos have to live through. It's plain wrong.

Almultimavenger (talkcontribs)

IAmEiji) I did read the article, swearing triggered man. That's why I commented.

EijiZeBoi (talkcontribs)

I DId READ THe aRTiCle, SwEArinG triggeREd maN. thaT'S WHy I CoMmeNteD.

ItMeansNothing (talkcontribs)

GTFO triggered animal lover

RTL101 (talkcontribs)

OMG are you moral guardian from PETA ?

What’s this doing here.

S012891 (talkcontribs)

Isn’t this tells the bad things Seaworld has done?

Unnamedgoon (talkcontribs)

Once again, stop complaining before reading the page.

S012891 (talkcontribs)

I read the page. But what about the part where they say that Orca captivity is, you know, cruel.

Unnamedgoon (talkcontribs)

Wow, they said orca captivity is cruel. How revolutionary.

S012891 (talkcontribs)

Also, how do you know everything they said is a lie?

Unnamedgoon (talkcontribs)

I didn't say that.

S012891 (talkcontribs)

I’m taking about the about the information the movie says and propogsnda.

Unnamedgoon (talkcontribs)

I'm not the one who made the page, so I don't know.

S012891 (talkcontribs)

Is that sarcasm?

Unnamedgoon (talkcontribs)

Yes, it is sarcasm.

Almultimavenger (talkcontribs)

Yes this article is completely uncalled for.

There are no older topics