How Hollywood has fallen. Creativity is drying up, SJWs are taking over, films are getting worse...
Not true. This is nothing more than another bad Disney live action remake, and there will still be good films in the future. Onward and Soul by Pixar will be in 2020. The past few decades have had their share of plenty bad cinematic films. Show some optimism, I know you're better than that. And you guys have been using "SJW" completely backwards for a while.
It’s probably because Liu supporters Police Brutality in Hong Kong as it says in the Celebrities Lacking Sense list.
I don’t know why I’m getting cynical. Maybe Grust’s influence rubbed off on me.
Well, he's obviously being dramatic. For every good film in the world that releases, there will be a bad film every now and then, and that's normal for the film industry because the film industry isn't perfect, and that's because it's made up by people who aren't perfect either. Remember, like I said, even the worst films of all time didn't release in this decade, especially The Garbage Pail Kids Movie and Troll 2.
Don't let people's words change you into someone you don't want to be. When that happens, brush it off and stay positive no matter what.
Last time I checked, 90% of the upcoming movies page on RT were sequels and remakes so it's not that he doesn't have a point only because his point isn't a positive point.
And if there is one thing Grust isn't, is being dramatic. He just has strong opinions but he always joke about stuff like this.
And a live-action remake of an animated movie just happens to be the quintessence of creativity drying up. You also admitted this is another bad live-action remake, so how is this supposed to prove Grust wrong?
I'm serious. I get really pissed off whenever someone says the word SJW, since it's so overused to the point where it gets annoying after a while.
That, and it really seems like that a lot of people who still use it don't even know what it's supposed to mean anymore (*Looks at TheQuarterWit and Complete Bullshit*).
Yeah, SJW has been the description of the behavior of Funimation voice actors, even though SJW means an individual who promotes socially progressive views. These Funimation voice actors aren't doing that at all, they are just being a**holes.
SJWs aren't people who promote socially progressive views, they are people who force suppossedly progressive ideologies and act in a very obnoxious manner about it; they also are people who force politics into entertainment.
SJWs are still a thing today otherwise lousy things like a student being expelled because he claims only two sexes exist wouldn't happen anymore. The term is valid, people overusing it doesn't mean much, just like the "using x in 2019 isn't acceptable anymore", which is just fallacious reasoning.
Hey, that is me from the future. I did not know this wiki moved to this random miraheze site. I thought we were on fandom forever.
Guys, This person is imposter, don't listen to him!
I Know! Right?!
I would've seen it, since it has an Asian cast, but when I found out they got rid of the songs and Mushu, I was like "Hell no, I ain't seeing this".
You just happen to like Asian people a lot or is there a subtle joke I don't get behind it?
What are you talking about?
Jeff is right! You need to learn what anyone said.
I’m just asking. It’s not just because of Liu supporting Police Brutality in Hong Kong isn’t it?
There are a lot of changes in this remake trailer that has turned off fans, S012891.
I want to change my profile picture, but whenever I try to, it just says that action is only limited to administrators. Can someone please help me?
So she can look more accurate to the 1989 animated film
Nah, it's unlikely they'll ever cast that type of actor, because they want to be more diverse. If anything, an Asian would be a better fit than Halle Bailey.
Basically if Hollywood were to say "WE wANT tO bE MOrE DiVeRse IN OUR rEMaKes", I would say, "Well then use an Asian if you want to be diverse".
Make "Disney. Pls cast an Asian as Ariel." A petition.
In other words, they use movies as a mere means of promoting diversity, something which doesn't have anything to do with entertainment and is already an inconsistent objective by default since there already is a lot of movies with actors of colour and other races.
They are just doing this with new versions of famous movies so they can get PR points and shock the mainstream viewers.
Also, think about it. For these people the actor is not as important as the race he belongs to. They want a diverse race first, then they look for a person of said race. The single individual doesn't exist for them, only races.
This reasoning by category of people is just the opposite of racism and just as bad and harmful to everyone.
What is your opinion on people defending Halle Bailey as Ariel and calling haters of Halle Bailey’s casting Ariel racist?
It's ridiculous. People say that the people against the casting are racists even though blackwashing is also racist.
Those people use the strawman fallacy to counter the criticism against the casting.
Not only are they changing Ariel to black, they're also changing Scuttle the seagull to female.
Oh you don't say. I wonder why they would do such a thing? But of course that's okay and anyone against it commits hate crime.
cringes extremely hard
You can say that again.
Well, I can guess the film would be doomed to fail.
I don't know. Many average viewers gobbles up everything you serve them.
I would've watched it if they casted an Asian.
I still don't get this joke.
You still can't change an already-established character and replace their iconic features just for so-called "diversity". Also, why an Asian instead of black or white?
It's bureaucracy of progressism. The preposterous belief that movies, which are just works of fiction, must reflect how the population is divided in real life. The more you carefully think about it, the more it becomes stupid in your mind.
Asian women look pretty. And Ariel is said to be a beauty, both on the outside and the inside.
This is where i'm going to get a lot of hate for this, and request a foe to me a lot for this. but here it goes...
Okay guys, I know a lot of you guys and fans of the series, are a little upset that almost all Final Destination movies on AMW, and I was hating the series, well...
Today, After a lot of thinking.... I guess (Just like Jeff35122 who did to The Amazing Spider-Man 2) I decided to reput the first three Final Destinations films, Will be on Greatest Movies Wiki... Since the first three movies that actually decent and good, and I was totally wrong about those three films. and yes, the fourth Final Destination will stay on Awful Movies Wiki.
I guess a lot of people loved the Final Destination series than being hated, Guess what? I guess the deaths and the scenes are actually good and hilarious a lot, and deaths are actually clever and the second film is more improved along with the third film. It's been a long year since the FD films are on this wiki.
I'm sorry guys... but this is something that i can never do...
Final Destination sucks dick. And goddammit, I accidentally thanked you. Only the 3rd movie was good. 1st movie, sorta, 5th movie, sorta too. 2nd and 4th, TRASH!
Guess what? Final Destination 2 and 4 are still bad.
That's what It's the best thing that i can do!
But thanks Eiji. I finally going to give up. The series kinda sucks, but sure, the 2nd one is pretty average, and I think first and the third one would be on GMW.
Those types of pages aren't authorized in any way. We also don't want to be like Horrible Music & Songs Wiki.
I would do what I do: use your sandbox for stuff like that.
That’s not what sandboxes are for though.
Charlie's Angels (2019). Not only was this film unnecessary, but it also has propaganda (very similar to Ghostbusters (2016)), the humor is very poor, the writing is atrocious and the characters are unlikable.
Not to mention, but because of the film's failure, Elizabeth Banks, the director of this film, has blamed men for it (when it's not true), showing that she can't handle even the slightest bit of criticism.
Now, try taking this in mind if someone plans on doing the page.
It’s already here.
ALL MOVIES AND AWESOME MOVIES, (AKA SOCKS) ARE CREATED, THAT MEANS TWO SOCKS FROM TOP MOVIES IS BACK!!!
I found a thread explaining how to make a good horror movie, and I was inspired to make my own thread in which I explain how to properly make a good movie. Here's the instructions:
If you can add any more instructions for making a good movie, let me know!
Also, if you're gonna make a movie to cash-in on something, make sure to execute it properly, like the Angry Birds Movie did.
Good tips, and for the fun of it, here's my advice on how to make the worst movie of all time:
1. Use every cliché you can think of and execute them in the worst way possible.
2. If it's a kids movie, use a lot of immature jokes such as toilet humour and make them as insufferable as possible, but if it's an adult movie, make sure swearing happens everywhere.
3. Also, if your film is a comedy, use toilet humour along with pop-culture references, jokes about suicide and racial stereotypes in every single comedic scene and have them be so painful to sit through that your audience will have so much of a headache that they feel like they're heads are about to explode.
4. Create a story that's just 10 jumbled subplots that interrupt each other and all are so predictable that it's like you can see into the future.
5. Rather than a three-act structure, follow a thirty-act structure.
6. The film should have the worst pacing imaginable, going from a film that is so slow that you feel like you are about to fall asleep to a film that goes so fast you can't keep up with anything to a film that zigzags between both so much you can't tell how fast or slow the movie is.
7. Make sure your writing makes no sense up to the point where not even the film's writer understands the story, add a bunch of plot holes, throw in random plot twists, and think of the worst dialogue possible (here's my made-up dialogue line: I just sliced an evil villain and I now feel like a boss).
8. Make the villain not threatening in the slightest and use every single overused villain trope you can think of.
9. The editing looks like it was done by a 4-year old and the film looks like it was recorded on an old iPhone.
10. Have CGI effects that looks like a PS1 game.
11. Use a soundtrack that sounds like broken MIDI.
12. Hire people who don't understand the concept of acting as actors for your film.
13. Make sure your film is a horror, action-adventure, comedy, drama and sci-fi film all at the same time with no flow or balance whatsoever.
14. Have scenes that are entirely pointless and can easily be cut out with the movie staying exactly the same.
15. The DVD cover should have false advertising, having the protagonist fighting a character that isn't even in the movie. Also make your title misleading if you want to.
16. Give us possibly the worst protagonists of all time in any type of media. Our main one is a dull, edgy, emo-type and just plain aimless protagonist who is haunted by a generic tragic backstory, causes the film's problem in the first place, treats his friends like dirt, and has no likability at all. Also, when he eventually redeems himself, it's right at the end and comes out of nowhere. You then have two comic reliefs who just might be the most annoying characters in the history of media. And then you have possibly the blandest of all love interests, having no personality, no flaws, no interesting moments and doing absolutely nothing useful to the plot.
I bet you can't get any worse than this!
I'm late to this, but I've learned from Hazbin Hotel (which isn't a movie but still) that it's kind of impossible to include "no cliches" at all in a movie or just about anything. Any idea you think is original is following another idea or was influenced by another idea. In fact, the word "cliche" has started to lose its meaning since superhero shows for goodness sake could be called cliches.
Taken care of that, but you get my point right?
I mean, its better than what we saw before. But a few things about his design looks off..
but still this design is million times better than the previous one.
As much as it mostly matches the Sonic we're all familiar with... it does kind of look a bit off in some places? (the face that Sonic is making)
Especially in that second shot with him facing forward.
Plus Sonic’s arms aren’t tan (that same problem I have with Boom Sonic’s design).
Mostly matched, but with Sonic Boom legs :/ I might not be as bad we think.
Fixed design or not, the movie still looks like bland generic focus tested bordedom.
Exactly. And the movie will still be a slog regardless.
I already know.
While people were mocking the original design they completely ignored that the movie looks like every typical "fictional creature arrives in our world some random normal guy finds the creature" story that has been done to death, no different from the live action Smurfs or Chipmunk movies.
No amount of cgi redesign can fix that.
I already know this movie is gonna be another cliche hybrid movie.
Also this movie still have extremely poor grasp of source material, just like the two smurfs movies.
For example, Sonic's fur can electrocute you, rings are portals that can teleport you to other locations, and Sonic can apparently create shockwaves while running.
Also his sidekick Tails is nowhere to be seen.
Only Sonic and Eggman come from the games, in fact.
I already know this is cannot save the movie but at least there's no creepy looking sonic with human teeth.
More of mediocre compared to his original design on his first trailer imo.
This movie is from Paramount Pictures, not Sega. ￼
Yeah, but SEGA is included in the production companies while Paramount Pictures distributed it.
But the designers are American. Not the original designers.
Sega's involvement doesn't go much beyond licensing the character.
and it's not. Still better than the creepy ass design.
At least it won't haunt your dreams for the rest of your life.
I don't know about that TNT.
The design still sucks!!! THEY BETRAYED US ALL!!!
Honestly, I think it's nearly worse than before.
Get out here. Don't let me post the original design.
He now looks like a puppet rather than hedgehog.
Okay, maybe the second image kinda looks like he's attached with strings, making him like a puppet. I see your point Sticky. But not the first image.
No and no. His design more resemblence his original counterpart.
Let's not start a flame war, here. It's just my opinion
I'm not that stupid to start a flame war. Don't worry.
I didn't say you were.
I think it looks great, I like how it sticks to the game design whilst doing something different at the same time (the original design did that too, but it failed badly). The only nitpick for me is the blue arms, which should have been changed too.
You know what. I don’t think we should worry about it. If that fails than it’s on Paramount. Not the franchise itself.
It's non-canon to the actual franchise, is it?
The redesign is really good and I was glad that the director has acknowledged about the original design and take it easy for the animators by simply delayed to changed from 2019 November to 2020 February, except the movie could not be saved for making another version of Yogi Bear/Smurfs/Garfield live-action.
AHHHHH- (gets shot by knock-out dart)
AW COME ON
OK pal, I want answers! Basically it looks like I'm gonna have to save your planet.
*crappy rap music plays*
Ho ho, is that all you got?
No BuT Thank YOU fOr AskIng
Sonic: Uh oh.
Doctor "Eggman" Ivo Robotnik: What ever this creature is... Our job is to secured it, neutralize it, and see what it takes. (Taste at Sonic quills until been electric shock)
We need Chao's Offical-PASDB.
The redesign is a thousand miles better than the original. Still. there are some problems. The shoes and gloves still look a bit off and need some work. Plus, just like the infamous Sonic Boom redesign, Sonic arms are once again blue instead of tan. Overall, while the design is better, the movie still has a lot of problems.
And looks like any other bad live-action adaptation.
The shoes and gloves thing seems more like a nitpick, I'm just glad he at least has gloves.
Even if it is a nitpick, there are still many problems with that design.
Acapal! It's a long time I don't see you around here. Welcome back.
Thanks! Sorry I didn't respond earlier. I've been busy with some work and I'm becoming a bit exhausted and slow.
It's a pity, several classic users left or are less active now. I hope you won't quit the wikis entirely.
Don't worry, I'm active occasionally. I just have a lot of personal business to do right now. But I'll still be active as much as I can.
That's good to hear. We already had to say good-bye to Unnamedgoon.
It hasn’t even been a year since Goon left. He was crucial to building our wikis.
I know, but you guys can still run the wiki as much as you can. As for me, I might help from time to time. In fact, I've actually been helping out on other wikis, mainly Terrible TV Show Wiki.
Right. Unnamedgoon told me he may come back on the wikis from time to time. But surely he left emptiness behind when he went away.
I know of some users who left. MacBarrPup quit on bad terms. Evil Tim disappeared. TheStarsOfTheSkies left. CoinyPinDonutBurch also disappeared.
MacBarrPup left for a stupid reason. He complained about Best TV Shows Wiki lacking legendary TV shows so he left, this made no sense because he could add them himself, also he claimed he didn't watch or know many TV series and this made the all thing even more senseless because it would mean he didn't even know what legends should have been added, the blog he once wrote about the shows he watched proved that.
Evil Tim really vanished. I still think he can return one day but the more time passes, the more I doubt it, sorta.
If there is one thing I would like to know in life, is to know what happened to TheStarsOfTheSkies and you know why.
Others we lost are DetoxCyanide, who really was the soul of Crappy Games Wiki. I talked to him on FANDOM a few months ago when Unnamedgoon left and he said he really couldn't like the layout of Miraheze. But he told me and Grand Albert he can come one day to write a page on Awesome Games Wiki, so let's hope for that.
About them, Unnamedgoon is not here anymore and Grand Albert is vey semi-active now.
Scarlet and JoeKido also left the wikis some time after changing hosting service. BelatedMike too. I don't see Luigitehplumber much these days. I think DaTenthGate also permanently left after the things he did on the characters wiki.
Only Grust and TyrantRex are the original users who are still here regularly editing the wikis, but they still only dwell in the games wikis, unlke on FANDOM.
But do you know CoinyPinDonutBunch is EezyCheezy? He changed is username some time when we still were on FANDOM, not long after the Great Movies Wikis Chaos in 2017.
Which makes his betrayal even sadder. Official-PSASD is still here. He was once Cpend7.
I know. It is great to still have Cpend7 around here, his activity increased too.
But I also didn't see Need4SpeedFan and DukeNukemForever anymore.
I am still unsure about EezyCheezy. Void claimed EezyCheezy's account wasn't hijacked. This means the IP is the same. If Top Movies was really a sock of him then the stewards would have found out way before that hijacking account thing on Best TV happened, because of the same IP adress. Don't you think?
I still think he was framed by someone who had the same IP as him. A schoolmate, an evil twin, it could be anything. That would also explain the old FANDOM harassing edits I found on Community Central. I tried to contact him on YouTube but got no reply. And his FANDOM profile reads "Goodbye cruel world".
Totally a mystery.
Official-PSASD even has knowledge on Miraheze coding. He even created a PlayStation All-Stars wiki. As for Eezy, I think he did all this on purpose. Whatever motive he might’ve had is beyond me.
Who knows. I still think something weird was going on, it was like he changed personality if he really was him.
It might be even funny, or not. But those WIS section of mine, might make you laugh or not.