Stuart Little 3: Call of the Wild

From Awful Movies Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Stuart Little 3: Call of the Wild
2005 - Stuart Little 3.jpg
You're better off watching the first two films instead.
Genre: Adventure
Directed By: Audu Paden
Written By: Bob Shaw
Don Mcenery
Starring: Michael J. Fox
Geena Davis
Hugh Laurie
Corey Padnos
Wayne Brady
Kevin Schon
Virginia Madsen
Photography: Color
Distributed By: Columbia Pictures
Release Date: February 21, 2006
Runtime: 75 minutes
Country: United States
Franchise: Stuart Little
Prequel: Stuart Little 2


Stuart Little 3: Call of the Wild is a 2005 American/Canadian direct-to-video animated film directed by Audu Paden, created by Mainframe Entertainment and distributed by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment.

The film was released in the other countries in 2005, until it was eventually released in North America on 2006.

Plot

The Little Family spend their vacation near Lake Garland. Meanwhile in the forest a beast is threatening the animals to give her food every night.

Bad Qualities

  1. While the first two films are CGI/live-action hybrids, this one is entirely animated for no apparent reason.
  2. It ignores the events from the first two films.
  3. It doesn't do what made the first two films special.
  4. Forgettable supporting characters.
  5. The animation is of rather poor quality.
  6. The main villain is pretty bland and forgettable, even when compared to the falcon from the second movie.
  7. Poor attempts at humor.
  8. Some scenes are nothing but filler.
  9. Some of the characters from the first two films are neither seen not mentioned, like Margalo and George's friend Will.
  10. It ultimately killed the Stuart Little franchise!

Good Qualities

  1. Most of the original cast members return (eg. Michael J. Fox returns as the title character).
  2. Fast-paced action scenes.
  3. Some funny moments here and there.
  4. Some enjoyable characters like Reeko (who can be found redeemable) and some of the other animals.
  5. Though it animation may have some bad parts to it, the rest is really good, as it looks very faithful to the original films, especially since the animators tried to make it look as realistic as possible.
  6. The voice acting is pretty decent.
  7. It would have been a lot better if it was in live-action instead.
  8. Some of the replacement actors do their best to sound like the original cast.
  9. Good soundtrack.

Comments


avatar

Mr. Dready

16 months ago
Score 4
R.I.P Stuart Little 1999-2006
avatar

Worldofjake2012

13 months ago
Score 2

Stuart Little 1: Decent Stuart Little 2: Awesome

Stuart Little 3: MASSIVE downgrade!
avatar

LeroyManTheFirst

11 months ago
Score 0
Blame the Moral Guardians.
avatar

The Autistic Raccoon

8 months ago
Score 0
What do the moral guardians have to do with this?
avatar

Jego5542Gonzalez

8 months ago
Score 0
This movie sucks because the third film is animated instead of live action
avatar

Chang

7 months ago
Score 0
The CGI in this movie looks like a bad 90s video game.
avatar

Kiyah Walter

2 months ago
Score 0

1st Stuart Little: Great Sequel Stuart Little: Amazing

3rd Stuart Little: It's a Pile of Fucking Shitass!!!!!

You are not allowed to post comments.