Star Trek: Nemesis

From Awful Movies Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

{{MovieInfobox |Title = Star Trek: Nemesis |Picture = ST_Nemesis.jpg |Quote = Star Trek Nemesis: "Hey can I copy your homework?" Wrath Of Khan: "Sure, just make it look different so that it doesn't look like you just copied it." Star Trek Nemesis: (Accidentally kills the franchise) "To boldly go where no-oops.." |Genre = Science Fiction |Photography = Color |Runtime = 116 minutes |Country = United States |Release Date = December 13, 2002 |Directed By = Stuart Baird |Produced By = Rick Berman |Written By = John Logan
Rick Berman
Brent Spiner |Cinematography = Jeffrey L. Kimball |Budget = $60 million |Box Office = $67.3 million |Distributed By = Paramount Pictures |Starring = Patrick Stewart
Jonathan Frakes
Brent Spiner
LeVar Burton
Michael Dorn
Gates McFadden
Marina Sirtis
Tom Hardy |Prequel = Star Trek: Insurrection |Sequel = [[mh:greatestmovies:Star Trek (2009)|Star Trek}} (2009)}} Star Trek: Nemesis (or stylized as Star Trek X: Nemesis) is the tenth film in the Star Trek film series, and the fourth and final film to feature the cast of Star Trek: The Next Generation. It was the final film to take place in the original Star Trek continuity, with the next film, 2009's Star Trek, being a continuity reboot.

Plot

A mysterious person named Shinzon assassinates the Romulan senate, takes control of their empire, and asks that Starfleet send the USS Enterprise-E on a diplomatic mission. When the Enterprise arrives, the crew are shocked to find that Shinzon is not only human, but in fact a clone of Captain Picard. After making a pretence at diplomacy, Shinzon abducts Picard, whose blood he needs to cure a fatal illness, while intending to use a weapon capable of destroying all life on Earth.

Bad Qualities

  1. The film blatantly copies the plot of the earlier Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. However, Shinzon is a character who's never been seen or mentioned in any prior Star Trek film or episode (unlike Khan), so his need for revenge on the Federation doesn't resonate with the audience.
  2. Though the film tries to explore the impact one's upbringing has on what a person becomes, it ends up falling flat because the film doesn't take it any further than Picard being a good person because he grew up in a good environment, and Shinzon being a bad person because he grew up in a bad environment.
  3. The Reman costumes look like generic vampires and feature absurd giant monster fingernails. In several shots it's extremely obvious that these nails make tasks like pressing buttons very difficult.
  4. Early on we're shown a picture of Picard as a young man: obviously, this is actually a photograph of Tom Hardy to establish that Shinzon looks like young Picard. Unfortunately, we've already seen young Picard several times in Star Trek: The Next Generation, and he had hair.
  5. There are several other continuity errors of similar type related to the filmmakers forgetting things from the series. One that stands out particularly is that it's stated that various parts of Picard and Shinzon are the same, including their hearts. But Picard has an artificial heart as a result of a near-fatal stabbing in his youth.
  6. Shinzon's motives are completely nonsensical. He was created by the Romulans, who then consigned him to working in mines and abused him and his Reman friends, but then decides that he not only wants to take over their empire, but help them destroy the Federation and conquer the galaxy. This is at least partly the result of Shinzon's original introductory scene being cut from the finished film; there it was made clear that he didn't really like the Romulans either, but realized that helping them out was the only way he was going to get the Remans treated better.
  7. Early in the film, the crew discover a simple-minded prototype of Data named B-4. Despite the fact that they'd already encountered an evil version of Data named Lore back in the TV series, they don't find B-4's existence remotely suspicious, and even download all of Data's memories, presumably including classified Starfleet knowledge, into B-4.
  8. Completely gratuitous car chase sequence when the Enterprise crew go down to the planet where B-4's parts are scattered. It's fairly well-known that Patrick Stewart likes dune buggies, and seemingly the dune buggy scene was some kind of tradeoff to get him in this awful movie. It is completely out of character for both Picard and Starfleet.
  9. B-4 adds very little to the plot; he gets caught trying to steal classified information from the Enterprise computers, is shut down, and then doesn't appear again until the very last scene.
  10. Shinzon keeps making idiotic mistakes throughout the storyline, making him impossible to take seriously as a villain. In particular, he insists on wasting time having dinner with Picard after they first meet, despite only having a week (if that) to live, and then fails to notice that the Enterprise crew have swapped Data for B-4, allowing him to rescue Picard. His plans are also needlessly convoluted: it is, for example, totally unclear why he would put B-4 on a planet full of Mad Max monster-people who shoot guns at anything they see, given this might get Picard killed and remove Shinzon's only hope of survival.
  11. Shinzon can't seem to decide how urgent the blood transfusion that's supposed to save his life is: he alternates between it being his main motive and farting around doing anything but actually performing the procedure.
  12. Midway through the film, there's a pointless scene where Shinzon uses the telepathic abilities of his right-hand man to telepathically rape Counsellor Troi. He gains absolutely nothing by doing this, it serves really no purpose to the plot, and it's pure dumb luck that this act doesn't end up alerting the Enterprise crew to the fact that he's evil (and even then, only because they'd already worked it out when they detected the planet-killing weapon on his ship).
  13. Geordi, Worf, and Dr. Crusher are all badly under-used in what was intended to be their final appearance in the franchise. Crusher, in particular, doesn't even get a single line of dialogue after the final battle begins.
  14. For some reason, Data goes back to being the completely emotionless android that he was in the TV series, ignoring the fact that he picked up a chip that gave him emotions in Star Trek: Generations and had it in both films prior to this one. There's not even any implication that he ever had the emotion chip.
    • Apparently in the last film even with his chip being remove he still do emotion but in that film apart of some scenes he does not which cause some plot holes.
  15. Shizon's tactical genius: if you have an invisible ship, make sure you fly so close to the enemy that they can hit you by firing blind.
  16. Shinzon's ship takes 7 minutes to charge up enough to kill 1,000 people. If it's assumed this scales linearly, this would have the minor problem that the ship would take about 80 years to charge up enough to kill the population of Earth. The alternative, namely that whoever designed the planet-killing weapon didn't think it might be useful to have a low power setting for when they want to attack something smaller, isn't much better. The system apparently also has to deploy "targeting wings" (which look like some kind of mixmaster attachment) to hit a stationary ship directly in front of it.
  17. In order to give Riker something to do, some Remans beam over to the suddenly-dark Enterprise (oddly, nobody suggests turning the lights up to inconvenience the space vampires, despite it being established that they have very sensitive eyes) and Riker has to fight the lead space vampire in a giant shaft that exists inside the Enterprise for some reason. It is almost exactly the sort of thing that Galaxy Quest made fun of.
  18. After the Enterprise is crippled while taking out the weapons on Shinzon's ship, Picard insists on beaming over alone to stop Shinzon, even though the consequences if he fails will at the very least be the death of everyone on the Enterprise, and possible everyone on Earth too. So that this can happen, the writers forget about the shuttles, the transporters in the shuttles, the transporters in the cargo bays, and the Captain's yacht. It then ends up looking ridiculous as the elderly Picard single-handedly mows down the entire crew of Shinzon's ship, only stopping short of killing Shinzon himself because he clumsily breaks his rifle during the fight.
  19. Very anticlimactic death for Shinzon, who dies when he runs into a sharp metal pole that Picard's holding. He then pulls himself along the pole before dying, in a bit blatantly copied from The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring.
  20. Data gets an even more anticlimactic death than Shinzon, when he jumps through space to get to his ship (which just looks ridiculous), then finds Picard and slaps a one-man transporter device on him to beam him to safety, and destroys Shinzon's ship by shooting the planet-killing weapon. It's so poorly handled, that even one-off characters in the various TV shows have had more effective death scenes.
  21. The film cops out of Data's death almost immediately, by showing that his memories are starting to surface in B-4 during the final scene.
  22. This film nearly killed the Star Trek franchise. And it also wasn't helped by the fact that Star Trek: Enterprise was unpopular among fans.

Good Qualities

  1. Some strong scenes between Patrick Stewart as Picard and Tom Hardy as Shinzon.
  2. Decent action sequences in the climax.
  3. The special effects are a lot better than they were in Insurrection.
  4. Riker and Troi finally get married, and Riker, after repeatedly passing the chance up in the series, finally takes command of his own ship.
  5. Good make-up effects on Shinzon's Reman allies
  6. Great soundtrack from the late Jerry Goldsmith.
  7. The idea of a nature vs nurture plotline is pretty interesting, despite the lackluster execution.
  8. Tom Hardy's performance as Shinzon was pretty passable.
  9. It brings back the Romulans to the film franchise just eleven years after their last appearance in Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country.
  10. Its successor, [[mh:greatestmovies:Star Trek (2009)|Star Trek}}, was a major improvement and saved the Star Trek franchise from being where StarGate is today.
  11. The scene where Ricker comments on how he first saw Data on the holodeck trying to whistle was a nice callback to the TV series' first two episodes, Encounter at Farpoint.

Reception

Star Trek: Nemesis was released on December 13, 2002, and it was not well-received by critics, audiences, or fans alike from the original, and the Next Generation series, but criticizing it for being the least successful in the franchise, which it's the least lowest rating Star Trek film, only behind Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, with common criticisms being that Shinzon was a weak villain and that the film's storyline felt tired. More significantly, however, the film was a massive box-office failure, failing to even top the charts at its opening weekend (opening in second place behind the Jennifer Lopez comedy Maid in Manhattan), and then experiencing a massive (and at the time, record-breaking) drop in its second weekend in the face of competition from The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers and, to a lesser extent, Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets and Die Another Day. The film currently holds a 38% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, based on 162 reviews, making it the second-lowest rating, behind Star Trek V: The Final Frontier, with an average rating of 5.2/10 with the site's consensus: "Nemesis has an interesting premise and some good action scenes, but the whole affair feels a bit tired." The film has earned a Metacritic score of 51/100 based on 29 critics, indicating "mixed or average" reviews.

Like the previous film, many of the cast have spoken out against the film, and especially director Stuart Baird's work. Tom Hardy, who played Shinzon, was also driven into depression by the film's critical and commercial failure, and to this day refuses to discuss the film in interviews.

In the following years after the film's release, and especially since the release of the more controversial Star Trek Into Darkness and the recent maligned TV shows, consisting of Star Trek: Discovery, Star Trek: Picard and Star Trek: Lower Decks, many fans have started looking back at the movie more fondly. However, it is still considered to be one of the weaker films in the franchise, if not the weakest.

Trivia

  • Prior to the film's release, producer Rick Berman and writer John Logan were working on a script for an eleventh film, which would have included the casts of Star Trek: Deep Space Nine and Star Trek: Voyager. Following the box-office failure of the film, however, Berman instead started working on an interquel film set prior to the original series, but Paramount rejected this script and replaced Berman with J.J. Abrams, ultimately leading to the 2009 Star Trek reboot film.

Videos

External Links

Comments


avatar

Stephenfisher2001

7 months ago
Score 0
It's Star Trek Into Darkness of 2002.
avatar

Stephenfisher2001

7 months ago
Score 0
And by the way, Is this how you end all Star Trek: The Next Generation films? Oh Nooooo!
avatar

Declan Kearns

7 months ago
Score 0

Personally, I actually enjoy this film and don't its as bad as everyone says it is. It does have its annoying, there is way too much action and as a finale for the TNG its rather underwhelming.

But I enjoy the nature vs nurture plot line, is very fascinating I actually enjoyed Picard battling his younger self and that in a different environment could have been entirely different. The relationship between Shinzon and Picard is kinda heartbreaking. Is it great? Not really, but I enjoyed watching it for the most part.

It could have been way worse. It could have been Into Darkness or Insurrection.
avatar

Xian Pu

5 months ago
Score 0

The more I think about it, the more I'm inclined to believe the theory that Paramount deliberately sabotaged the Star Trek franchise in the early 2000s so that that they could fire Rick Berman and bring in a producer who was more willing to compromise on Gene Roddenberry's vision in order to make the franchise more commercial and more profitable.

I mean, seriously, what did Paramount think was going to happen when they hired a director who knew nothing about the series, and then released the resulting movie up against The Two Towers?

You are not allowed to post comments.