Shrek Forever After

From Awful Movies Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Shrek Forever After
MV5BMTY0OTU1NzkxMl5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMzI2NDUzMw@@. V1 UX182 CR0,0,182,268 AL .jpg
Genre: Action
Fantasy
Drama
Directed By: Mike Mitchell
Written By: Josh Klausner
Darren Lemke
Starring: Mike Myers
Eddie Murphy
Cameron Diaz
Antonio Banderas
Julie Andrews
John Cleese
Walt Dohrn
Distributed By: DreamWorks Animation
Paramount Pictures
Release Date: April 21, 2010 (Tribeca Film Festival)
May 21, 2010 (United States)
Runtime: 93 minutes
Country: United States
Prequel: Shrek the Third
Sequel: Puss in BootsGMW (by release date)
Untitled Shrek reboot

Shrek Forever After, previously promoted as Shrek: The Final Chapter, is the fourth installment in the Shrek movie series and the sequel to Shrek the Third. Produced by DreamWorks AnimationGMW and distributed by Paramount Pictures, the film was released in the United States in May 21, 2010.

Plot

Having become weary of his duties as a family man and celebrity, Shrek wishes to go back to being a "real ogre". When he comes across the conniving Rumpelstiltskin, Shrek gets his wish in exchange for the day he was born and is transported to an alternate Far Far Away where he never met Fiona and ogres are hunted like prey, and he must find a way to nullify the contract to restore the world and reclaim his true love.

Bad Qualities

  1. The plot basically steals elements from not only the first film, but as well as It's a Wonderful LifeGMW, Back to the FutureGMW and the Disney animated movie The Little MermaidGMW. Not only that, the film contains several movie clichés.
  2. The idea of adding in more ogres just makes Shrek less of a special kind of character.
  3. Rumpelstiltskin's plan to erase Shrek from existence is quite dark for a kids' film.
  4. While the previous three Shrek films had their fairy-tale moments, this one just doesn't feel like a fairy tale-esque movie at all and feels more like a "war against society"-style movie.
  5. The film contains very inappropriate dialogue such as "I'm being ass-napped!" and the infamous "My donkey fell in your waffle hole" line.
  6. Unexplained plot holes: if Shrek was never born, then whatever happened to the previous villains of the franchise, Farquaad in particular?
  7. There are several problems with the characters:
    • Everyone is irritating, as they start worshiping Shrek, loudly talking to him all at once and constantly bothering him all at the same time.
    • Rumpelstiltskin is very inconsistent with his appearance in the previous film, since he has a completely different appearance and personality, and his voice is even different. His voice is also very cringe-worthy to hear.
    • Everyone in the parallel universe is unlikable and acts like a jerk to Shrek (though to be fair, the parallel universe did take place in the time everyone was still hateful toward ogres, like in the first film).
    • Just like in Shrek the Third, Shrek and Fiona's children add absolutely nothing to the plot other than to serve as a typical "happy ending."
  8. Some of the jokes and humor are unnecessary, disgusting, and a bit cruel, like the one where Shrek tries to ask Gingy where Rumpelstiltskin is right before Puss in Boots eats him alive.
    • In particular, some jokes also make no sense, like the one where Shrek wanted to tell Rumpelstiltskin to take away the day he met Donkey.
  9. It totally ignores the events from the previous film, even though that is probably a good thing. On top of this, Arthur Pendragon and Merlin don't seem to even exist anymore and aren't even mentioned.
  10. The baby ogre cries are even more annoying than in Shrek the Third.
  11. There is a scene where Shrek acts way too mean-spirited and out-of-character by saying that his life was better before he saved Fiona, his wife, and to add insult or injury, he said it to her face.
  12. The song "Happy Birthday Bash" is way too fast and annoying.
  13. There is yet another absurdly high kill count in this film, like when Rumpelstiltskin throws some water at a witch's face, which causes her to melt, and when Fiona uses her powerful singing to cause Fifi to explode in the end.
  14. There is bizarre writing that is all over the place and weird at times.
  15. The film contains horrid pacing that switches a lot, even more than in the previous movie.

Good Qualities

  1. The film has a lot of respect for the franchise, the first film especially.
  2. Great animation that is an improvement from the first three films.
  3. Decent voice acting, thanks to the cast, like Mike Myers, Cameron Diaz, and Eddie Murphy reprising their roles from the last three films.
    1. Most of the dubs, interestingly, also reprise their roles from the last three films; Brazilian Portuguese (Shrek, Fiona, Donkey, Puss in Boots, Queen Lilian, King Harold, Magic Mirror, Pinocchio, Big Bad Wolf), European Portuguese (Shrek, Fiona, Donkey, Queen Lilian, etc.), European Spanish (Shrek, Donkey, Fiona, etc.), French (Shrek, Donkey, Fiona, Puss in Boots, Pinocchio, Gingerbread Man, etc) and Italian (Shrek, Donkey, etc.).
  4. There are some funny moments here and there like Donkey saying "Try Lou's bliss!".
  5. Weezer's cover version of "I'm a Believer" is pretty decent.
  6. Even if it is flawed, the film is at least a bit of improvement over Shrek the Third.
  7. The birthday party scene is delightfully hectic and a good metaphor for what Shrek the Third had diluted the franchise into: loud, annoying and childish, and what really drives it home is how it takes place in what used to be the dark and seedy Poison Apple bar.
  8. Rumpelstilskin and the Pied Piper are entertaining antagonists in their own ways.
  9. One of the ogres, Cookie, is a likable character.
  10. Decent musical score and the song choices aren't as questionable as in Shrek The Third.
  11. The main characters from the predecessors are still likable and put in a new and original light, Fiona in particular where we see how life locked up in a tower has affected and traumatized her.
  12. It is a nice send-off for Shrek, although the franchise will be getting a reboot.

Reception

The films received mixed reviews from critics and audience, although it was improvement over Shrek the Third. The film currently holds a 58% rating on Rotten Tomatoes based on 197 reviews, with the consensus reading "While not without its moments, Shrek Forever After too often feels like a rote rehashing of the franchise's earlier entries."

Trivia

  • Arthur and Lord Farquaad were originally going to appear in this film; Arthur was supposed to appear as the king of Far Far Away (who would be abusing his powers), and in the parallel universe, Arthur would've still been in high school, and Farquaad was supposed to appear as Lord of Duloc in the parallel.

Videos

External Links

Comments


avatar

BlazePlastic2003

8 months ago
Score 4
I still enjoyed this film, don't get me wrong.
avatar

FreezingTNT

7 months ago
Score 1
I know exactly how you feel.
avatar

Harajuko

2 months ago
Score 0
I also enjoyed this sequel! Sure it had it's flaws but I still see it as a really good movie.
avatar

Hayden B.

3 months ago
Score 1

Honestly though, does this movie REALLY belong on this wiki?

(Now, before you hate me, I actually think Shrek The Third deserves to be on this wiki)
avatar

Harajuko

2 months ago
Score 1

I agree, as some of the points listed seem a little biased; I don't really think the plot of Shrek Forever After ripoffs other films like Back to The Future (And the Little Mermaid? Why? Because Shrek signs a magic contract to get what he wanted??), but it is fair to say the story of It's a Wonderful Life has been done plenty of times to the point where it's becoming cliche (I still really like the plot of Shrek Forever After though, don't get me wrong!).

Also some claims in #7 can be explained:

- Shrek's behavior can be explained by the opening montage of what his life had became up until his childrens' first birthday. I'm pretty sure if you had to go through the same tiring routine everyday that you too would be very sick of it. And as for Shrek yelling at Fiona, yes that was a really mean thing for him to do, but remember that Shrek was becoming less satisfied with how monotonous his life was becoming and people can say things they end up regretting when they let powerful emotions like anger take over.

- Of course the party scene is going to be like that, with everyone being loud and bothersome, because otherwise how would Shrek reach his breaking point that would lead him to finding Rumpelstiltskin and signing the contract?

- I actually think Shrek and Fiona's children aren't merely put into the movie just for "a typical happy ending to the film". Sure, they might not contribute much to the film's plot but the movie still goes out of it's way to show that they had an effect on Shrek's character.

And after Shrek The Third was released, it put a damper on the Shrek franchise as a whole, so to an extent it does makes sense that some see Shrek Forever After as a contested sequel.
avatar

Worldofjake2012

one month ago
Score 0
A big improvement over Shrek the Third.

You are not allowed to post comments.