Ghostbusters (2016)

From Awful Movies Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ghostbusters (2016)
Ghostbusters-finalusposter.jpg
Who you gonna call? Someone else.
Genre: Supernatural
Comedy
Directed By: Paul Feig
Produced By: Ivan Reitman
Amy Pascal
Written By: Katie Dippold
Paul Feig
Based On: Ghostbusters by Ivan Reitman
Dan Aykroyd
Harold Ramis
Starring: Mellisa McCarthy
Kristen Wiig
Kate McKinnon
Leslie Jones
Chris Hemsworth
Michael Kenneth Williams
Distributed By: Sony Pictures Releasing
Columbia Pictures
Release Date: July 9, 2016 (TCL Chinese Theatre)
July 15, 2016 (United States)
Runtime: 116 minutes
118 minutes (Extended version)
Country: United States
Australia
Language: English
Budget: $144 million
Box Office: $229.1 million
Sequel: Ghostbusters 2020 (reboot) (cancelled)

Ghostbusters also known as Ghostbusters: Answer the Call is a 2016 American supernatural action comedy film and reboot of the Ghostbusters franchise and the 1984 classic film of the same name. Directed by Paul Feig and written by Katie Dippold and Feig, the film stars Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon, and Leslie Jones as parapsychologists who start a ghost-catching business in New York City. The film premiered at the TCL Chinese Theatre in Los Angeles on July 9, 2016 and was released in the United States on July 15, 2016, by Columbia Pictures.

When the movie was released on July 15, 2016, it received positive reviews from critics. But, was panned by the fans and audience alike, criticizing its political agenda and its SJW content and it failed at the box office. Ghostbusters (2016) is widely considered to be the worst reboot films of all time, forcing Sony to cancel any sequels for the rebooted Ghostbusters series and eventually opting to continue with the original Ghostbusters series instead with Afterlife, which will be released on March 5, 2021.

Plot

Erin Gilbert and Abby Yates are a pair of unheralded authors who write a book positing that ghosts are real. A few years later, Gilbert lands a prestigious teaching position at Columbia University, but her book resurfaces and she is laughed out of academia. When ghosts invade Manhattan, Gilbert reunites with Yates, teaming up with a nuclear engineer named Jillian Holtzmann and a subway worker named Patty Tolan to save the world from a mysterious evil and powerful ghost known as Rowan who can exercise control over human forms.

Why It Sucks

  1. Despite the film being a reboot and having improvements that weren't shown in the original film, this film is almost a complete rehash of the original Ghostbusters.
  2. Mediocre to unlikable characters.
    • The main characters are portrayed as completely obnoxious and lack the chemistry and charisma the original Ghostbusters had in the original 1984 film and its sequel. For example, at one point our new team steal the equipment needed to build the Proton packs instead of building them from scratch.
    • Kevin (Chris Hemsworth's character) is an annoying comic relief character.
    • Rowan, the antagonist is lame and doesn't come off as scary even when he's in his ghost form.
    • Overall, it’s as if the casting choices were made for the sake of having a female-led cast.
  3. Weak writing and acting mixed with tons of pointless pop culture references to better films and TV series (eg. various Patrick Swayze films, The Wizard of OzGMW, JawsGMW, etc.)
  4. Mediocre special effects, especially for the green screen effects for the ghosts.
  5. Forced political agendas that make the movie blatantly misandrist, where the female characters are considered strong and smart while the male characters are considered weak, dumb and idiotic.
  6. A variety of unfunny, juvenile humor is featured in this film, such as toilet humor and sex jokes. Another piece of humor that fails is the running gag of Abby whining about wontons.
  7. Blatant product placement (e.g. Pringles, Papa John's Pizza and Coca-Cola).
  8. False advertising: In the trailer, the announcement text mentions the original Ghostbusters, but this film has no connections to the original films. Another misleading header is that despite the film being titled Ghostbusters, the team only busts one ghost and in the climax, the Ghostbusters shred ghosts and are somehow able to kill them.
    • The film was also advertised as a letterbox film, but the green screen effects on the ghosts were put in 16:9 widescreen. There's even an entire scene in the 16:9 widescreen format.
  9. Too many unnecessary dancing scenes (as pointed out in RedLetterMedia's review) and those scenes get even worse in the extended cut that make them longer than 1 or 2 minutes.
  10. The film takes shots at detractors of the movie, which comes off as immature, disrespectful, and abrasive. In one scene, the new Ghostbusters see a comment on YouTube that reads "Ain't no b*tches gonna hunt no ghosts".
    • The film's director (and co-writer), Paul Feig also acted rather abrasive towards criticism of the film by accusing the detractors of his film of being misogynists and labeled fans of the original films as trolls, he also showed support for Jones and criticized Twitter's handling of the situation. Feig tweeted: "F*ck the haters. And haters, attack me all you want but when you attack and insult my cast, you've crossed the line. Grow up and leave my cast alone."
  11. The ghosts look like a rip-off of the ghosts from The Haunted Mansion or the live-action Scooby-Doo films.
  12. While the theme song covered by Fall Out Boy and Missy Elliott was somewhat catchy, it was panned due to its pop-rock and rap. It also doesn't match the tone for the film.
  13. The film feels more like a bad Saturday Night Live skit.
  14. Pointless cameo appearances by the original cast, but not as their characters.

Redeeming Qualities

  1. Much of the original cast (Bill Murray, Dan Aykroyd, Ernie Hudson, Sigourney Weaver, and Annie Potts) made cameo appearances, despite them being pointless.
  2. A lot of good designs for ghosts.
  3. The action scenes are surprisingly more impressive than the original. The 1984 film had decent enough effects, but it was mainly them stand around and pointing sticks. In contrast to the original Ghostbusters, the new Ghostbusters do flips, slides, punch ghosts and even whip the ghosts into somersaults.
  4. The scene at the end where Erin saves Abby from Rowan’s grasp within the portal is admittedly pretty awesome.
  5. The comment Bill Murray's character telling the new Ghostbusters, "You only lack the proper equipment like a garbage truck to hang onto the back of." After all, their uniforms look like garbage collecting uniforms.

Controversy

When Sony announced that all four of the Ghostbusters were going to be female, the announcement sparked a big controversy. When the original trailer for the film was released on March 3, 2016, it got tons of dislikes and as of right now, it is currently the 19th most disliked YouTube video with 78.04% dislikes. In response to the negative reactions towards the trailer, Paul Feig accused haters of the film of being misogynistic towards the cast.

Reception

"There are people out there who like to pay people to shit in their face, but just because someone else likes to be shit in the face, doesn't mean that I have to like being shit in the face.
And that's the beauty of living in a free country, that some of us can be shit in the face, and be content, and that others can be shit in the face, and not be, and I was not content with this face-shitting.
I hope you don't hold it against me the way I don't hold it against you, but I do not like being shit in the face.
And that's what this film Ghostbusters 2016 reboot was. A gigantic shit in the face.
"

JLongbone


Despite getting lambasted by fans and audiences alike, Ghostbusters (2016) received positive reviews from critics with a praise for the cast and visuals and a 74% "Certified Fresh" rating on Rotten Tomatoes with an average of 6.5 out of 10 and a critic consensus that reads "Ghostbusters does an impressive job of standing on its own as a freewheeling, marvelously cast supernatural comedy -- even if it can't help but pale somewhat in comparison with the classic original." On Metacritic, the film has a Metascore of 60 based on 52 critics and received mostly negative reviews from fans and audiences alike. The user score on Metacritic is a 2.9/10. Film critic Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times awarded the film with a "D-", a one-star rating and described the film as "a horror from start to finish." [1]

Box Office

Ghostbusters opened up at #2 on its opening weekend with a domestic gross of $46 million. In foreign markets, it grossed a total of $100,796,935[2]. Following the #2 opening, the film later dropped down to #5 in week 2, then to #7 in week 3 and at week four it dropped to #9. The film bombed at the box office after getting a box office return of only $128.3 million in the U.S. against its $144 million budget and overall, the film made $229 million worldwide. [3] Sony, which distributed the film, spent over $100 million on marketing and lost at least $70 to $75 million following the film's poor performance at the box office.[4] The film contributed to the $1 billion write-downs of the value of Sony Pictures in January 2017.

Future Sequel or Sequels?

Sony announced that if the film was a hit, there would be sequels. Due to the poor box office results, however, Sony decided to cancel further sequels to the reboot. Despite the cancellation of the sequel, Feig stated in an interview that he still expresses interest in making a sequel.[5]

On January 15, 2019, Sony announced that Ghostbusters: Afterlife (or Ghostbusters III) is finally going to be released on March 5, 2021, and as a result, the rebooted Ghostbusters franchise was officially rendered dead and became non-canon to the franchise. Shortly after the announcement, Smooth Jazz Waluigis and actress Leslie Jones criticized the third Ghostbusters film, claiming it's "sexist" to refuse to acknowledge the reboot, though Jones eventually praised the approach.

One Year Later

On June 4, 2017, almost a year after the film was released, Dan Aykroyd spoke out against Paul Feig in an interview and said that he skipped key scenes from the film assuming they weren't needed and required $30 to $40 million worth of reshoots when test screenings showed they were indeed needed. He later stated that Paul "won't be back on the Sony lot any time soon." [6] In April of the same year, Paul Feig issued an apology on feeding Internet trolls.[7]

In November of the same year, Feig expressed regret about the negative impact Ghostbusters had on the public and stated, "I think it kind of hampered us a little bit because the movie became so much of a cause. I think for some of our audience, they were like, 'What the f*ck? We don't wanna go to a cause. We just wanna watch a f*ckin' movie'"; at the same time, he is still satisfied with his work on the film and continues to defend it, explaining "It was a great regret in my life that the movie didn't do better, 'cause I really loved it. It's not a perfect movie. None of my movies are perfect. I liked what we were doing with it. It was only supposed to be there to entertain people."

Trivia

  • Bill Murray didn't want to return in the original version of this film unless his character was killed off.
  • Rick Moranis was the only original cast member that refused to appear in the 2009 video game, the cancelled third film, as well as this film since he retired from acting many years earlier.
  • The film wasn't screened in China because films involving ghosts are not permitted by the strict Chinese codes on film content.
  • A bust of Harold Ramis is seen in the film.
  • Before the film was made, Amy Pascal, the co-chairman of Sony at the time of the Sony Hack of 2014 asked Paul Feig to make the film, but he declined the offer numerous times.
  • Co-writer Katie Dippold stated that Sony disliked the film in an interview.[8]
  • The Sony Hack of 2014 leaked out the plot.
  • Paul Feig reportedly had a meltdown on set while making the film.

Videos

References

External links

Comments


avatar

AlreadyInUse

13 months ago
Score -7
It's not THAT bad in my opinion.
avatar

TheInterneto

12 months ago
Score 9
Just the political agendas offended people, mainly.
avatar

Spongebuff1991

7 months ago
Score 2
If you like it, more power to you.
avatar

EijiZeBoi

4 months ago
Score 2
Does this comment really deserve downvotes?
avatar

LeroyManTheFirst

one month ago
Score 0
Downvotes are obviously sexists.
avatar

Backman

11 months ago
Score 3
The way some of those who worked on this film has made me refuse to watch it.
avatar

Spongebuff1991

10 months ago
Score 6
I refuse to see it as well.
avatar

ItMeansNothing

10 months ago
Score 9
This film is actually so stupid, it's funny as hell.
avatar

DJ2006

10 months ago
Score 5
Like what you think of Infinity War?
avatar

Drcynic22

9 months ago
Score 4
I saw it. It was just a bad movie. If it was anything other than a Ghostbusters movie, it would still have been a bad movie. I thought Hemsworth was very good in it and Leslie Jones made me chuckle a couple of times, but overall, it was just not good.
avatar

Spongebuff1991

9 months ago
Score 12
I give a clap to Rick Moranis for refusing to make an appearance in the film.
avatar

EijiZeBoi

9 months ago
Score 10

:)

avatar

HellLord

2 months ago
Score 0
XD that video was funny as hell
avatar

The Autistic Raccoon

one month ago
Score 0
This is the most beautiful thing I've heard in my life.
avatar

PhantomVulture

9 months ago
Score 4
I always thought that Extreme Ghostbusters was bad enough, but this, this is just a disgrace to a legendary franchise.
avatar

Stephenfisher2001

9 months ago
Score 6

And we still got nine months away from Ghostbusters III.

Screw the reboot. Ghostbusters (2016) Otherwise, The fake Ghostbusters III.
avatar

SkyBlueYoshi

8 months ago
Score 2

An all Female Ghostbusters..... Why Though

Made worse is the fact that they're an all female cast is the only defining character trait they have

So in other words its diversity first and character second
avatar

Masson Thief

7 months ago
Score 0
A common problem nowadays.
avatar

Animdude64

7 months ago
Score 3
As if the film wasn't controversial enough, my stepdad really think this movie is tied into the original series. Even when the Afterlife trailer came out, I keep telling him that this is the 3rd film in the franchise, but not the 3rd in the timeline. He just refuses to listen and believes I'm usually my "flawed logic". My stepdad clearly doesn't know the differences between a sequel and a remake. He doesn't even wanna learn the differences between the two. Bottom line, criticism does not equal sexism.
avatar

Masson Thief

7 months ago
Score 1
Of course not, but this fallacious reasoning has been used to counter criticism against the movie.
avatar

Stephenfisher2001

7 months ago
Score 4
Ghostbusters II is actually better than this. :)
avatar

Spongebuff1991

7 months ago
Score 4
Agreed!
avatar

Stephenfisher2001

6 months ago
Score 2
Even though Ghostbusters II wasn't well-received by critics, Ghostbusters II will always still be better than the 2016 one. :)
avatar

PhantomVulture

7 months ago
Score 1
Me too.
avatar

Spongebuff1991

7 months ago
Score 2
In terms of popular '80s films and or franchises, I grew up with the Back to the Future films before I saw the '80s Ghostbusters films. I also grew up with the Indiana Jones films.
avatar

Glitchmaster

5 months ago
Score 1
When will the actual 3 come out?
avatar

FreezingTNT

5 months ago
Score 0
In a few months.
avatar

Spongebuff1991

4 months ago
Score 0
It has been postponed now.
avatar

EijiZeBoi

4 months ago
Score 2

Ghostbusters 2016 is the best anime!

*waits for downvotes*
avatar

Theblazemaster4

one month ago
Score 2

To everyone who downvoted:














r/whoosh
avatar

EijiZeBoi

one month ago
Score 8

Ghostbusters 2016 is a MASTEEPIECE OF AN ANIME!!! The pacing is not too slow, but not too fast. The action sequences are AWESOME. I LOVED all the anime fight sequences with Izuku Midoriya and Bakugo plummetting the ghosts with their Quirks with the help of the Ghostbusters team. All the characters are well-written and I almost thought Midoriya and the female Ghostbusters team were real. The comedy easily rivals Monty Python and Looney Tunes by a long shot. The animation is so good that it makes movies from Disney and Studio Ghibli look like trash!!! No anime can top Ghostbusters 2016's animation. It's way better than the trash known as the 1984 Ghostbusters and its shitty-ass sequel. All those anime such as Cory In The House, Star Wars: The Last Jedi, Shrek, Spirited Away, Naruto Shippuden, Sonic X, or any other good anime combined still can NEVER beat this anime. Thank you Paul Feig for helping to make this anime come to life.

1000000/10

It's that amazing
avatar

HellLord

one month ago
Score 1
Nice joke mate :)
avatar

EijiZeBoi

one month ago
Score 4
Whoever downvoted my comment, look up the definition of a joke.
avatar

Athaggard160

29 days ago
Score 1
That was literally the dumbest Ghostbusters movie I ever heard of.
avatar

Stephenfisher2001

24 days ago
Score 2
Ghostbusters (2016) is the most extremely overrated reboot film ever. Right Spongebuff1991? ;)
avatar

EijiZeBoi

24 days ago
Score 0
It's the best anime.
avatar

Spongebuff1991

23 days ago
Score 4
I agree with you, Stephen.
avatar

Spongebuff1991

6 days ago
Score 2
To add to that, I am grateful that Dan Aykroyd told about Paul Feig's behavior on live television and that smile he had on his face when the interview was over.
avatar

Stephenfisher2001

6 days ago
Score 2
And I'm happy that Richard Roeper of the Chicago Sun-Times criticized the 2016's Ghostbusters reboot too! 🙂
avatar

Spongebuff1991

3 days ago
Score 0
Right on, Stephen. I admire Richard Roeper a lot.
avatar

Tony Li

7 days ago
Score 0
All males became females in this movie...
avatar

LancedSoul

3 days ago
Score 0
Like Men in Black: International, this is easily one of the worst of Ghostbusters movies, It can even go to hell like Men in Black: International.

You are not allowed to post comments.