User:Esaïe the man/sandbox/Stardust (2020)

From Awful Movies Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Esaïe the man/sandbox/Stardust (2020)
Stardust david bowie.jpg
David Bowie must be rolling in his grave at this...
Genre: Biographical
Directed By: Gabriel Range
Produced By: Paul Van Carter
Nick Taussig
Matt Code
Written By: Christopher Bell
Gabriel Range
Starring: Johnny Flynn
Jena Malone
Marc Maron
Distributed By: IFC Films
Release Date: November 25, 2020
Runtime: 109 minutes
Country: United Kingdom
Canada
Language: English
Budget: $5,500,000 (estimated)
Box Office: $9,087


Stardust is a 2020 British-Canadian biographical film about English singer-songwriter David Bowie and his alter-ego Ziggy Stardust. It is directed by Gabriel Range, and produced by Paul Van Carter, Nick Taussig and Matt Code, from a screenplay co-written by Range with Christopher Bell. Johnny Flynn stars as Bowie, alongside Jena Malone and Marc Maron in supporting roles. It was released on November 25, 2020 by IFC Films.

Plot

The film centers on Bowie's first tour in the US in 1971 and his creation of the Ziggy Stardust persona following this visit, whilst also showing Bowie's origins.

Why It Sucks

  1. Horrible grasp of the source material.
    • Ron Oberman drops 30 'f' bombs, in real life, Ron never cursed.
    • Disgraceful characterizations.
      • David Bowie here is dumbed down into a childish, kind of stupid person, lacking any direction or drive.
      • Angie Bowie's wig looks kind of ugly, with the unexplained lack of a big bump in her dress. Nothing unites her character while pregnant with the slender post-birth iteration.
    • Poor pacing. For example, The film takes a really long road trip with him and his road manager, while his flashbacks and daydreams add up to nothing much.
    • There is a constant parade of anecdotes which lead to nowhere, while several music writers pass through to little effect.
  2. It uses none of David Bowie's music, as it was made against the wishes of his family.
  3. Poor acting and casting choices. William Dafoe's acting is especially painful to watch.
  4. The film tries but fails to concentrate on a period in the late David Bowie's career that many fans are fascinated by; as a result, it ultimately boring to watch.

Redeeming Qualities

  1. The soundtrack is fine.

Reception

Stardust was met with "generally unfavorable" reviews from critics at review aggregator Metacritic, with a weighted average score of 36 out of 100, based on 15 reviews. According to Rotten Tomatoes, 14% of 43 critics gave the film a positive review, with an average rating of 3.80/10. The critics consensus on the website reads: "Ground control to Major Tom, Stardust did not put its helmet on."

In the NME, Mark Beaumont gave the film four out of five, writing that it worked better as a "revelatory road-trip movie" rather than a biopic. He felt the lack of Bowie's music "robs the film of the sense that Bowie's glowering talent was being criminally ignored".

David Bowie's family didn't approve of the film, due to the poorly adapted screenplay.

Trivia

Videos

External Links

Comments


avatar

Esaïe the man

4 months ago
Score 0
It made only $1,667 on its opening weekend
avatar

Esaïe the man

4 months ago
Score 0
I will make this into an article

You are not allowed to post comments.