This wiki has been closed following a Request for Comments. Please see this page for more information.

BloodRayne 2: Deliverance

From Awful Movies Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
BloodRayne 2: Deliverance
To deliver or not to deliver.
Genre: Horror
Directed By: Uwe Boll
Produced By: Dan Clarke
Shawn Williamson
Written By: Christopher Donaldson
Neil Every
Based On: BloodRayne by Majesco and Terminal Reality
Starring: Natassia Malthe
Zack Ward
Chris Coppola
Michael Pare
Distributed By: Event Film
Release Date: September 18, 2007 (United States: DVD premiere)
November 30, 2007 (Germany: DVD premiere)
Runtime: 99 minutes
Country: Canada
Language: English
Budget: $10 million
Franchise: BloodRayne
Prequel: BloodRayne
Sequel: Bloodrayne: The Third Reich

BloodRayne 2: Deliverance is a 2007 direct-to-video western horror film, directed by Uwe Boll and starring Natassia Malthe, Zack Ward, Chris Coppola, and Michael Pare. It is a sequel to the 2005 film BloodRayne.


Rayne, a half-human/half-vampire warrior, ventures to America's Wild West to stop vampire outlaw Billy the Kid and his posse of vampire cowboys.

Why It Sucks

  1. With its overall plot, the movie barely resembles its source material.
  2. The movie is loaded with Western cliches.
  3. Rayne is completely useless, constantly getting beaten up and captured, and needing help from others.
  4. Bad scene continuity; the amount of snow changes frequently between shots, sometimes from having snow to no snow at all.
  5. Terrible cinematography: the camera shakes all the damn time.
  6. The costumes, sets, and the film itself look incredibly cheap just like the first film.
  7. Terrible acting; the actors either overact or underact.
  8. Terrible script with inane dialogue.
  9. There's a noticeable lack of fight or action scenes, and the few ones we do have are poorly choreographed.
  10. It feels like this sequel didn't exist when the first film bombed and just somehow got a sequel for no reason.

Redeeming Qualities

  1. A vampire western movie could be pretty interesting, if it were done better.
  2. At least it doesn't use much cheesy CGI like the first movie did.
  3. Overall, it's slightly better than the first movie (though still not good).


Reception to the movie was negative; the movie received a rare 0% on Rotten Tomatoes.


External Links