Blog:Top 20 Worst Movies of the 2010's



2010's had great decade for movies, but instead, it turn out to be bad I ever seen, alright, let's do it.

Number #20

The main problem is that I was expected to be funny.



Why this film was nominated at the Academy Awards for Best Animated Feature? I mean really, Why this film was nominated at the Academy Awards for Best Animated Feature? That's a dumbest choice I ever seen, since it needs to be The Lego Batman Movie and Captain Underpants: The First Epic Movie. The characters are bland and unlikable, the story is much ridiculous, the humor can be childish and not funny at all, the imagination was much pointless, and overused of pop-culture reference such as The Beatles. It really wasted the talent the actors such as Alec Baldwin, Tobey Maguire, Steve Buscemi and more. Some of characters have not appeared in the source material, making it extremely unfaithful to the book it was based on. To quote on infobox, This movie isn't the boss, baby.

Number #19

Before The New Mutants, there was a biggest box office bomb on 2019.



Out of all this film, it was messed up the X-Men timeline even more. The film takes place in 1992, making James McAvoy's Professor Xavier and Michael Fassbender's Magneto age into Patrick Stewart and Ian McKellen in the timespan of eight years, like WIS says. characters are forgettable, pacing is bad, lots of villain have completely nerfed, and not to mention, Mystique's death scene was cringe-worthy, disgusting and unsettling to look at for all. It was also released when Avengers: Endgame and Aladdin were overshadowed at the box office, which making it to bomb, again like WIS says. To quote on infobox, The Phoenix will NOT rise.

Number 18

If you seen planet and bird movie, you may what it looks like.





As Free Birds, Reggie is extremely unlikable protagonist, speaking of Reggie, he was at least a tolerable character at the beginning of the movie when he tried to warn the other turkeys about Thanksgiving, but soon be became a really big jerk to Jake after Chief Broadbeak's death, shameless product placement like Old Navy and Chuck E. Cheese's, as Chuck E. Cheese's, pizza from there is delivered to Reggie, despite Chuck E. Cheese's not delivering food until 2018, five years later, some animation error such as the face paint on the turkey's face disappears, pointless subplot between Reggie and Jenny, Miles Standish is weak villain overall, extremely poor ending with a ridiculous plot twist is extremely dumb, as the problem of turkeys being eaten for Thanksgiving is solved with replacing turkeys with... pizza, like what is says,, the first Thanksgiving took place in 1621. However, pizza did not yet exist until 1889, 268 years after the first Thanksgiving, making the ending very pointless, and the idea of two turkeys traveling back in time to stop the first Thanksgiving is unique, but was executed horribly like WIS says. To quote on infobox, The LAMEST Turkey movie of all time.

And as Escape From Planet Earth, The plot is a blatant ripoff of Planet 51, except the cast switched over. General Shanker is completely weak as a villain and it makes Lena look like the actual villain. He is also basically a humanized version of Grawl from Planet 51. Pointless subplot between Shanker and Lena. Many plot holes here and there. Lots of product placement like 7-Eleven or even Doc talking about Shanker with some photos like Google and Apple and even companies like Pixar. Really lame action scenes that even the action scenes from Planet 51 is looked better. The alien designs are basically ripoff of both the aliens from Planet 51 and the titular protagonist from Megamind if they were mashed together, and the hazmat suit guys are a complete and unoriginal rip-off of the 2319 CDA hazmats from Monsters, Inc., which was far better than this. There is also some false advertising, for example, The city on the poster and DVD cover that characters are never appears in the movie, and pointless cameo of Simon Cowell like WIS says. To quote on infobox, If only Planet 51 wasn't bad enough...

Number #17

Some films based on toys are good, but there is bad movie based on toys.



I don't really know if that's a case, this film is mostly ripoff of The Lego Movie, mainly copying not just the concepts, but even story elements, tones, certain characteristics of the protagonists, and set locations. And unlike The Lego Movie, which it managed to have a great story and message, Playmobil: The Movie itself is purely an advertisement for Playmobil products, except it doesn't really advertise very well, either. The Lego Movie showcased the rebuildable, interchangeable, and customizeable nature of Lego's, but Playmobil has no such qualities, and the movie doesn't really get into what makes Playmobil figures and sets unique from other toy lines what so ever. The characters are bland and unlikable. The songs are generic and pointless. It's just poorly written. And the different areas within the Playmobil world are all the different themes the company produced sets for, such as western, Viking, Medieval, etc., which are all very generic and uninspired like WIS says. To quote on infobox, Actual size of UNepic adventure NOT shown here. So go home, idiot.

Number #16

Seriously, who ask for this reboot!?



I hate the reboot. This film don't deserve to be reboot! Who think its a good idea? Does anyone want this reboot? Well, no. Lets not forget the characters, they are forgettable. Its weak writing and acting mixed with tons of pointless pop culture references to better films and TV series (eg. various Patrick Swayze films, The Wizard of Oz, Jaws, etc.), unfunny, juvenile humor is featured in this film, such as toilet humor and sex jokes. Another piece of humor that fails is the running gag of Abby whining about wontons, blatant product placement (e.g. Pringles, Papa John's Pizza and Coca-Cola). Theme song, while catchy, covered by Fall Put Boy and Missy Elliott was panned due to its pop-rock and rap. Mediocre special effects, especially for the green screen effects for the ghosts. And the ghosts look like a rip-off of the ghosts from The Haunted Mansion or the live-action Scooby-Doo films like WIS says. All I have to say is: This is awful. Critics will love this film, but for audiences? They completely won't. To quote on infobox, Who you gonna call? Someone else.

Number #15

And if you think Ghostbusters 2016 is worse, these two are even worse.





Well there you are.

As Ice Age: Collision Course, it lack of continuity, as it ignores the events from the first four films, with the possible exception of the third installment. It overuses lots of 2010's pop culture references, which feels very out-of-place in an Ice Age movie. Some scenes, characters and concepts steal elements from other animated movies, For example, The fact that the movie ends with a popular song sung by a famous singer ("My Superstar" by Jessie J, who provides the voice of Brooke) is exactly like how Zootopia, another film released in 2016 featuring talking animals, ends with "Try Everything" by Shakira, the fact that the movie ends with a wedding and everyone happily dancing to the aforementioned song is a pretty generic ending, the story-line of Manny being overprotective of his daughter and seeming to despise and not want anything to do with her fun-spirited lover who is reasonably nice is just ripping off Hotel Transylvania, to the point where Julian can be considered a carbon copy of Johnny, the scene where Buck has three other Bucks living in his brain is an obvious rip-off of Inside Out, Gavin, Gertie, and Roger are just dumb rip-offs of Shenzi, Banzai, and Ed from The Lion King, and Crash and Eddie being dressed as babies and acting like ones in one scene is an obvious rip-off of Top Cat Begins. Buck adopting and raising a baby pumpkin as his own is rather stupid, forced, pointless, nonsensical and even unfunny. It has over eighteen main characters, which is way too much for a movie to handle, which is why the plot constantly sidetracks with each individual character arc. Apparently, this movie completely rips off a scene in the original Ice Age movie where the main characters discover a spaceship encased in ice while walking through an ice cave, meaning that this film is really unoriginal. Seriously, if Pixar did the same thing, then they would be criticized for unoriginality. It is filled to the brim with so much unfunny, unoriginal, and even forced humor that takes away all of the suspense and tension within the movie, since it practically doesn't even take itself seriously. Forgettable antagonists with extremely lame motives. In fact, the movie didn't really need a real villain, since the asteroid is basically the "villain" like WIS says. To quote on infobox, Kiss your movie franchise goodbye.

And as Norm of the North, Similar to many television shows and movies animated by Splash Entertainment, this movie has bad, weak, and cheap-looking computer-animation with a few mediocre graphics, to the point where it looks more like an early 2000s computer-animated film rather than one made in the 2010s. Dull plot, with an unsatisfying ending. Unoriginal ideas, such as Norm being an outcast and becoming accepted by his community at the end of the film through saving them is similar to Chicken Little's plot, and even steals elements from other animated movies, such as Happy Feet, Open Season, The Lion King, and Madagascar. Lackluster voice acting, particularly in one scene where Mr. Greene is yelling at Vera, which sounds like the actor was far away from the microphone. In another scene near the beginning, Norm's voice sounds distorted, which is probably because of an issue with the recording equipment. Overuses of pop culture songs such as "Shut Up and Dance" by Walk The Moon. Terrible music score composed by Stephen McKeon. Several characters have poor and annoying characterization. One example is Mr. Greene, who constantly runs and jumps around as if he is meant to be in a 1930s cartoon. Also, his energetic animation clashes with the other characters, who are more stilted and realistic. The film also tries to portray the characters as sympathetic despite not giving them any kind of nice and likable characterization or even just some decent development. The film suffers from atrocious writing. For example, Mr. Greene becomes popular after trying to shoot an innocent bystander (that being Norm) with a tranquilizer gun at a "public" restaurant, and there are multiple fake-out deaths with Norm and his grandfather. The film also repeatedly points out how ludicrous a talking polar bear is, which, unfortunately, does not make the idea any less ridiculous like WIS says.. To quote on infobox, After its release, it became a great lesson in how not to make such movies!

Number #14

Ummm.... what?



What is this? You think you love it? No, alright moving on, while better than first film, the animation is weak, It was disgusting and gross humor, weak final battle, unlikable characters (while still), predictable story, stupid plotline, and bad ending. Extremely cheesy and cliché writing and dialogue, Almost takes away the entire tone of what made the first film so enjoyable and charming while staying true to the fairy tale it was based off of. Here, it feels more like a mixture of a bad buddy cop film, The film tries too hard to make it seem like a movie much more similar to Shrek, The puns are cheesy, Red and Kirk's new voice actors, Hayden Panettiere and Martin Short, barely sound like Anne Hathaway and Jim Belushi, Lots of scenes that drag on such as the characters talking too much, Some of the lip-syncing is off, Stolen font. During the scene where Red is looking for the Dark Castle Towers, there is a store that uses a Disney font, Unfunny and completely unoriginal running gags, Japeth, the singing goat, constantly getting hurt or nearly gets killed feels completely out of nowhere and unneeded as it has no purpose to the “plot” and it really never happened to him in the first film, so it just feels undeserving. To add insult or injury, Japeth nearly gets killed and ran over when the car Red, Wolf and Twitchy ride comes straight at him at the very end of the film, Almost every character says “Oh Muffins!” in every scene which will get unfunny really fast, Kirk the Woodsman and Boingo feel thrown into the movie at the last minute, Most of the film takes place in a city as opposed to a forest village like the first film, which takes away the charm the first film had, And Several models of characters from the first film are reused a lot in backgrounds just even like WIS says. To quote on infobox, Even the title is awful.

Number #13

This movie is anything, but ugly.



Who thought its a good idea? Not really, moving on, it was on development for 9 years, which is almost late to making a movie, like The Emoji Movie, this film is a complete cash-grab and was only made just to advertise the UglyDolls plushes. It's basically a commercial disguised as a movie. It is also similar to films like The Angry Birds Movie in the aspect of it being based on something that isn't very popular these days, despite The Angry Birds Movie was executed well. This was released at a time of overshadowed film releases such as Avengers: Endgame and Pokémon Detective Pikachu, which didn't help the box office numbers, and the designs of the UglyDolls that are really not that ugly at all, as they've been cutesified to appeal towards kids like WIS says. The characters are bland and annoying, and its basically ripoff of Toy Story and Trolls, it is also killed charm direction of Kelly Asbury, respectfully. To quote on infobox, The first animated/family film made by STX Films, but had nothing to do with the merchandise, leading it to kill the franchise, and led STX Films to make even more films based on toy franchises just to cash-in.

Number #12

Questionable movie for reasons.



I have no idea how they made a awful mummy movie with most famous voice performance, Tom Cruise. The main problem is that it focuses more on setting up the Dark Universe than on being a movie of its own by shoving in pointless side characters such as Dr. Jekyll that exist only to tease sequels, as a result it loses focus on its own plot which becomes incomprehensible and at times stupid (Ahmanet makes a deal with an evil god... to kill people with a knife? She didn't need selling her soul for that). The movie obnoxiously flashes the Dark Universe logo despite it being the first (and only) movie in the franchise with nothing properly setup. By comparison, Marvel Cinematic Universe movies didn't start showing the MCU stylized Marvel logo until the franchise was properly established years after it began. Bad acting, the film can get rather dark for it's PG-13 rating, where Ahmanet slits her baby brother's throat, Sub-par special effects, and the ending of the movie is anti-climactic and weak just like WIS says. To quote on infobox, And you thought The Mummy: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor was bad...

Number #11

What the hell is a thing?



I think horror films have went downhill after this one, The idea of making Ouija movie is rather pointless. Related to the above, there's a lot of filler, since the movie has to revolve around the ouija board, unlikable characters, badly down acting, terrible ending, despite being horror film, none of them are scary, in fact, the movie is overreliant on jump scares, the story is cliched, predictable, and overall extremely generic, and Poor CGI and visuals like WIS says. To quote on infobox, This movie points to NO.

Number #10

How are movie is this?



Um this isn't horror, its just crime, get it? Ok then right on. While the movie takes place in Norway, none of the actors are Norwegian, and none of them use Norwegian accents (in fact, most of them use British accents instead). The film was supposed to be in 2011, but took until 2016 for production to begin after a number of directors dropped out. As a result, the plot is extremely incoherent. The film's production was rushed. According to Alfredson, 10-15% of the scenes were not filmed. A number of subplots are brought up that are never resolved. Due to medical problems, Val Kilmer's lines were unintelligible, leaving his lines to be poorly dubbed in by someone else. The characters are all bland. There are quite a few scenes that are weird and irrelevant, and could be cut without affecting the movie just like what WIS says. To quote on infobox, Go read the 1978 Raymond Briggs book instead of this.

Number #9

You disappointed me, George Lucas?



Very disappointed for George Lucas, The film had less magic in the movie, the plot uses every love cliche you can find in the book, the film blatantly rips off other movies, unlikable and cliched characters (except Bog King and Imp). The musical numbers are obnoxious as they're only pop-rock versions of popular hits including (but not limited to) "Can't Help Falling in Love", "I'll Never Fall in Love Again", "I Wanna Dance with Somebody (Who Loves Me)", "Strange Magic", and Tell Him", and "Wild Thing", the characters not only refuse to shut up, but also never stop singing. The musical numbers come up so frequently that it makes the audience appreciate the songs even less, while the animation is lovely to look at, the character designs of the ferries and elves have this uncanny feel to them. similar to Rey and Kylo Ren In Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker (another product of Disney and Lucasfilm), Bog King and Marianne's romantic chemistry is not developed properly as they only begin to fall in love near the end, with only 20 minutes left in the running time, the ending shot, although well-intentioned, can nauseate the viewer, and the post-credits scene showing Roland kissing a fly is tasteless and not very funny at all like WIS says. To quote on infobox, Why George Lucas, Why?

Number #8

Oh look, its ruined Disney.



Wow Randy Moore, what the hell happened to you? You attacked Disney I ever life, so lets go. The movie fails to properly use the Disney World setting and makes numerous, glaring inaccuracies, a confusing mess of a plot akin to David Lynch movies such as Eraserhead. However, unlike Eraserhead, this movie is weird and unsettling for all the wrong reasons, Jim is an absolutely unlikable and mean-spirited main protagonist, as he stalks other underage girls, abuses his family, and even cheats on his wife, however it was later even addressed by Randy Moore that Jim was not really a hero that the audience should root for, but more or less a jerk-ass anti-hero, due to his inappropriate actions he does throughout the film, wooden acting, The characters are incredibly mean-spirited and one-dimensional (except maybe for the evil ex-employee, who at least has some characterization), especially Jim (see WIS #4), extremely obvious green-screen, special effects wouldn't work in a few scenes, thus ruining the scene itself like poorly-edited black eyes on a few characters, utilizes unconformable and shocking scenes/subplots like the aforementioned cat flu in the worst way possible, although Disney is a harmless but occasionally controversial entertainment company in real life, the movie goes out of its way to portray them as being more evil than the Nazis. The director even went as far as comparing the company to a satanic cult in a behind-the-scenes interview. While there have been quite a few accidents at Disney World, they are not as frequent as this movie suggests, the movie feels more like an attack on Siemens, the engineering company, rather than Disney, poor writing and terrible dialogue. Most notably, there's a scene where Jim describes Spaceship Earth as a "giant testicle", filler scenes about people on the rides that drags on for too long and have no relevance to the plot, lame soundtrack, the ending is incredibly confusing like WIS says. To quote on infobox, What have you done, Randy Moore!?

Number #7

Adam Sandler has gone wrong.



Adam Sandler have got worse which no one likes them until Hotel Transylvania arrives, time to do it! Offensive and disgusting jokes about incest, statutory rape, gerontophilia, (DON'T LOOK THAT UP) child neglect and pedophilia, some of the concepts don't even make sense such as Donny becoming famous because he had sex with his teacher, countless substance abuse. For instance in almost every scene Adam Sandler is in, he would have booze with him, the protagonist is completely unlikeable and very annoying even though everyone in the movie loves him, poor dialogue, numerous other unlikeable characters, white trash stereotypes, no real morals or lessons are learned in the movie, horrible grossout humor, the priest fight scene is a rehash of the Bob Barker fight scene from Happy Gilmore like WIS says. To quote on infobox, That's NOT My Boy

Number #6

Fantastic Four have went downhill.



The main problem is that movie was made was so that 20th Century Fox could hold onto the Fantastic Four film franchise and not lose the rights to Marvel Studios/Disney, and it shows, Ironically, the 20th Century Fox acquisition resulted in Marvel regaining the rights to the Fantastic Four anyways as well as being bought out by Disney, which also owns Marvel, the troubled production history set this movie's reputation in stone, the movie seems as if it's ashamed of its source material, and just to drive the point home, the name "Fantastic Four" is NEVER mentioned on screen at all, the character design for The Thing is horrible. The Thing doesn't even wear pants like in his previous incarnations. It could reasonably be argued that even the Roger Corman film's version of The Thing looks better than this one, Doctor Doom on the other hand looks like some sort of melted plastic toy that was put in a microwave rather than a scientist wearing a metallic suit. He's also nothing short of a complete, total and utter monster, contrasting his tragic villain characterisation from the comics gravely, multiple reviewers have noted that Doctor Doom looks like a crash test dummy, and while we're on this subject, Doom's presence as the main villain happens VERY late in the movie, the movie also takes itself far too seriously, and is very dark, which is a far cry from the comics and even from the previous movies. It aspires to become, to quote Trank himself, a "David Cronenberg superhero" movie. It does feature body horror akin to The Fly and stars super-powered people, but fails miserably in combining them due to the horror film theme not fitting well with the Fantastic Four characters, much of the film is just boring conversations in rooms with the lights turned off, similar to Man of Steel, this movie uses a rather dull and washed-out colour palette, which heavily goes against that of the original comics, and more like WIS says. To quote on infobox, This movie is anything BUT fantastic

Number #5

Why just why?



How come we got there film? It need to be another season at all, moving on, Subpar Adobe Flash animation that is particularly horrible at certain parts in the movie (such as the scenes at Disney World), the nudity is so bad and forced (especially in parts where it just was not necessary), it is in a league of its own, the most infamous being the 3D sex scene towards the end that's actually a selling point on the DVD, By the way, the film even contains child pornography because the main protagonist of Suck My Taint Show (who is a minor) constantly shows the spot between her anus and vagina in the scenes where the show is being recorded. It can also be the same thing when the Suck My Taint Show girl is making out with her husband (whose not only older than her, but is also the main villain!), there are several plot holes throughout the movie, the film insults South Park with how it includes a poorly made parody and several references of the aforementioned show. It also constantly rips off South Park except without its charm and humor, as a blatant gross-out joke, the rocket that is styled like a corn has poop falling down the bottom, the film is very boring at times, notably the scene where the Drawn Together gang is listening to director's commentary to figure out how to get out of a sinking carriage. It is basically one long scene that drags on for too long where the directors are talking with barely any animation in the background. The gang makes some comments on the commentary here and there, tons of tasteless and unfunny jokes, the villain's backstory has a huge plot hole: he claims his family had a car accident after seeing a billboard advertising Drawn Together. While this is based on a real event that happened when the show was airing, the villain wasn't there when it happened, so he basically just blamed the Drawn Together gang when he could have just assumed they crashed for some other reason and none of the trouble would have happened, the villain's backstory also has too much going on at once with his wife and daughter dying by falling into a radioactive lake full of crocodiles, the movie recycles audio clips of the characters screaming, which can get repetitive, Several creepy and unsettling facial expressions, Ling-Ling is seriously misused. In the show, he was a homicidal battle monster who could generate energy and electricity attacks, but in the movie, he does absolutely nothing of worth, Captain Hero is frequently seen making out with a corpse he stole during the middle of a funeral that he calls "Molly", which is necrophilia, Things get more disgusting with how the corpse also slowly rots as well, the movie fails at mocking other works. For example, in the prologue, not only does Toot (indirectly) call Barney Rubble "gay", but said character even gets run over (see above!). And it keeps going south from there, Wooldoor Sockbat was flanderized from a nice, innocent, fun-loving member of the Drawn Together gang into a complete psychopathic nervous wreck just like WIS says. To quote on infobox, We could’ve at least get another season!

Number #4

Adam Sandler, will you please stop it?



The way Adam Sandler plays the two title characters is poorly done, the "identical twin" fact is completely wrong. Identical twins must be identical. If they are two different genders then they are fraternal twins, two completely different babies who happen to be born at the same time from the same mom, ridiculous and laughable concept, shameless placement everywhere, even being the focus of the story (e.g. Jack trying to get Al Pacino to advertise Dunkin' Donuts), horrendous jokes, Both Jack and Jill are unlikable in their own different ways, especially Jill because she can be quite selfish and rather whiny sometimes. For example, when she complained and sulked because there was one birthday cake). Also, Jill's appearance is very ugly, and all you can see is Adam Sandler in drag, terrible acting, save for Al Pacino, lots of pointless celebrity cameos featuring Al Pacino, Drew Carey, Christie Brinkley, Johnny Depp, Vince Offer, etc. It also features a cameo from Jared Fogle, which did not age well, Jill's voice is ear-piercing and annoying, Cringeworthy dialogue, The Dunkaccino isn't a product made up for the movie, by the way. It's an actual product you can buy, the story is predictable and non-existent, poor editing where a lot of scenes come out of nowhere, the Thanksgiving dinner scene would make sense if it took place at the end of the film instead, Felipe's grandmother, Juangelina, who was also played by Eugenio Derbez looks way too horrible, her voice is out of place and she's shown too much which makes her downright terrifying and nightmare inducing, so much padding, if Al Pacino changed his first name from "Al" to "Dunk", his full name would be "Dunk Pacino" not "Dunkaccino" like WIS says. To quote on infobox, Thanks alot Adam Sandler, you ruined their life!

Number #3

These two of them have go to die forever.





As Where the Dead Go to Die, The official trailer says nothing about the film, the story is by far the worst. It only has three different people: Tommy, the drug addict in the "Liquid Memories" segment and Ralph with a covering on his head, but this plot is non-existent, Everything in the movie makes no sense, Abysmal animation that's very glitchy, Speaking of animation, there are many segments that are very disturbing and violent. (e.g. The limbs yanked out of bodies like legs, arms and even genitals, brutal on-screen deaths, child abuse, and even child pornography and bestiality), Jimmy ScreamerClauz himself admitted he was high on drugs when he wrote this. This basically explains everything wrong with this film, He also said that the film was intended to be a dark comedy, but little to no viewers found it funny. Instead, most were revolted and frightened, awful voice acting and sound that feels completely out of place, all the characters are terrible. They range from idiotic (Tommy), annoying (Ralph and his twin, Tommy’s dad), unlikable and selfish (the murder from the second short), disturbing (The little girls dad), too just plain evil and satanic (Labby), the poster for this movie is extremely terrifying to look at like WIS says. To quote on infobox, Stay in hell, you hell-spawn of a movie!!

And as Foodfight!, It is a $65 million film that looks worse than the CGI animation from the 80s, with scarily ugly visuals, creepy character designs, and abominable animation that looks like it was animated with ear wax and toe skin. It looks like the character designs were made from the writers' worst nightmares, On that point, the animation was a huge downgrade from the original files, which got stolen and had to be remade from scratch, the animation's lip-syncing is completely off-track, Revolting character models (like the shopper lady). The old versions of said models are much better, In particular, Lady X is way too sexual and inappropriate for a film meant for kids and behaves like a Jessica Rabbit knock-off, Sunshine Goodness is supposed to represent the Sun-Maid Girl, but they made her look like a cat-person. She also has such bad eye contact with other characters that it may take some time for a viewer to realize she isn't supposed to be blind, Most of the intended brand advertisers pulled out when it became clear the movie would be a disaster and are replaced with ersatz versions of brand icons, usually the vilest character designs the creators could come up with. This appears to be a rather strange attempt at revenge, Most of the intended brand characters are not used or widely known outside the United States, which would have limited the film's international appeal in a scenario where it wasn't awful, The characters are either annoying, cringe-inducing, or both, Bestiality implications in a kids' movie . For example, Dex is seen dancing with Lady X, At the end of the movie, Dex and Sunshine (a cat humanoid) get married, Poor attempts at humor, with Dex's constant food puns being an example. The line he says that's most infamous for not making any sense is "Let's strawberry jam out of here!" Some jokes are so poorly formulated as it takes serious thought to even understand that they are jokes. For example, at the beginning of the film, Dex is dealing with a rat who is constantly called "Fat Cat" except for one instance where he is called "Fat Cat Burglar" and this only makes sense if the viewer connects it to the fact that he has stolen a basket of kittens. The motion-capture arm acting and facial expressions are absolutely terrible, with rumors that it was made using Xbox Kinect (the truth was not much better, as the technology used required the actor to stare directly at the capture equipment and not move their head). Two notable examples would be when Doctor Si Nustrix is talking to Dex, you can see in the background that Dan looks like he's spazzing out. Another one would be when the Brand X army are marching, they constantly throw their hands around, the poster is an inexplicable lie since it pushes the main characters to the lower-left corner and showcases the side characters. The poster also rips off the box art of Over the Hedge. Also, one of the listed mascots, Chiquita Banana, doesn't even appear in the film, as she is replaced by an expy and more like WIS says. To quote on infobox, If you want to watch what has often been quoted as one of the worst animated films of all time, we are telling you, don't.

Number #2

Oh my god, what the hell is this!?



Universal Pictures, what have you done!? The designs of cats are very creepy, uncanny, and don't even resemble real-life cats; they look more like humans in fursuits. They are also reminiscent of the 2003 film adaptation of The Cat in the Hat, which Universal also distributed, to make matters worse, when a character turns or tilts their head, their faces barely move, making them look off-center, the designs are also inconsistent, as some characters have clothes, while others don't. Also, some of the cat characters walk normally like humans, while others walk on all fours like WIS says, even Mars Needs Moms had much better than this! It was development for twenty-plus years, making it too late. The characters are bland, the singing is bad. and it was poor grasp of the source material. The setting of the film, for example, isn't set in a destroyed London like in the original Broadway musical. It also lacks the dark tone of the original, again like WIS says. To quote on infobox, The movie that gave cats a bad image

Number #1

And if you think Cats, Foodfight! and Where the Dead Go to Die are worse, than this one is even worse.



Columbia Pictures, we need to talk, your animation studios, Sony Pictures Animation has replace Popeye for the emojis, one question, WHY? Why make an animated movie about emojis? Why reject Popeye in favor for The Emoji Movie? Why have apps like Candy Crush and Just Dance be featured? Why steal elements from Inside Out (2015), Wreck-It Ralph (2012) and The Lego Movie (2014) for your film? Why have Patrick Stewart suffer the indignity of voicing literal poop? Why make the character of High Five annoying? Hell if I know! I can understand with some elements such as Gene's life as a multi-expressional emoji and being shunned for it as a metaphor for anti-homosexuality prejudice, but The Emoji Movie is such a disaster that it has contradictory morals, flat or annoying cliche characters, a predictable story and tasteless jokes. It is true that The Emoji Movie is as bad as people say. Move over, Foodfight! and Where the Dead Go to Die! A new animated feature film is going to horrify the general public now like what any DeviantArt user says. To quote on infobox, 👆👉💩

Go to cinemas, buy some tickets, and have fun you don't watch these worst movies!

Note: WIS stands for Why It Sucks.