The Hunchback of Notre Dame II

The Hunchback of Notre Dame II is a 2002 American romantic musical comedy-drama film and is one of many straight-to-video sequels made by Disney. This one, in particular, is a 2002 sequel to their 1996 animated film, The Hunchback of Notre Dame, loosely based on Victor Hugo's novel.

The movie, like many of Disney's "cheapquels", was panned by critics and fans of the original movie alike. It currently has a 30% on Rotten Tomatoes and a 4.7 out of 10 on IMDb.

Plot
Take a journey back to Paris's magnificent Notre Dame Cathedral, to revisit Quasimodo and his friends. The lovable yet lonely bell ringer pits his wits against evil circus owner Sarousch, a master of sorcery, whose latest evil plan is to steal the cathedral's famous bell, La Fidele.

Why It's Uglier than the Hunchback

 * 1) Abysmal animation quality, even for Disney direct-to-video standards: This movie was animated by some of the animators of Batman: The Animated Series. While that show IS spectacular in it's own right, compared to the first movie, this one feels cheaper.
 * 2) * The film's animation quality is so poor that it feels rather out-of-place of all of Disney's low-budget animated output made for television/home video, which is unacceptable since even most of Disney Television Animation's TV cartoons of the time had way better animation than this. Instead, it's animation quality feels more on par with the cheap direct-to-video animated mockbusters produced by cheap companies like Golden Films at the time.
 * 3) Being a sequel to perhaps the darkest Disney film of all time, you'd think that the tone would carry over to the sequel...it did not. Instead, it went for a more lighthearted-romance movie which gives the characters without love interests from the original film a love interest for no discernible reason (see WIS #12).
 * 4) The lip-syncing can get so bad that at some points, they don't even bother moving the characters' mouths.
 * 5) The new characters introduced in this film are poorly conceived:
 * 6) *Sarousch is a horribly weak and pathetic main antagonist, even for Disney direct-to-video standards, and is a massive downgrade from the first film's main antagonist Judge Claude Frollo. In the first movie, Frollo, a ruthless Parisian justice minister, wanted to burn down Paris and potentially kill many, many innocents, just so that he can get rid of Gypsies. Sarousch, on the other hand, is nothing but an arrogant, vain douchebag, who's generic plan involves stealing La Fidele to become rich.
 * 7) **In fact, Sarousch in an incredibly lame and rubbish villain, even by Disney direct-to-video-sequel standards, so much to the point that he even makes Morgana from The Little Mermaid II: Return to the Sea look like an effective and threatening villain in comparison, and feels more like a rejected Saturday morning TV cartoon villain than an actual Disney animated movie villain.
 * 8) *Zephyr is very annoying and he has no purpose to be here.
 * 9) *Madellaine is pretty, but she is unfortunately bland and forgettable.
 * 10) Too many plot holes and continuity errors. Examples:
 * 11) In the first film, Esmeralda's eye's were green, but for some strange reason in the sequel, her eyes are blue.
 * 12) At the end of the first film, Quasimodo is finally accepted by the people of Paris, and was implied that he finally moved out of the Cathedral's bell tower. In the sequel, however, he is still living in the bell tower for some unexplained reason, though it's most likely possible that he's still doing his job as a bellringer.
 * 13) And speaking of La Fidele, why is there jewels on the inside? It'd hamper the bell's ability to ring, and even if it rings, the jewels will be shattered anyway, so it'd just be ruined in the long run.
 * 14) Forgettable and horrible songs with idiotic lyrics, for example, "An Ordinary Miracle".
 * 15) Horrible script and lame dialogue, like where Sarousch says this infamous line "I could kiss me, but I'd fall in love."
 * 16) The Gargoyles are more annoying and get a lot more screen time in this film.
 * 17) Phoebus somewhat acts like a complete jerk as well, believing that Carnies (the circus people) are evil, which Esmeralda compares to gypsies (though he was proven right later on). This also sounds racist, considering that this is a kids movie.
 * 18) Esmeralda gets very little screen time despite being a key character and heroine in the first film.
 * 19) The final battle near the end of the film is poorly done, as a climax set in an underground sewer where Madellaine and Quasimodo work together to save Zephyr from Sarousch is nowhere near as epic as the first film, where Phoebus, the Gargoyles, the Gypsies as well as the people of Paris fights off Frollo's minions, while Quasimodo and Esmeralda fights Frollo on the top of the Bell Tower that's is being pouring down by molten copper.
 * 20) The first film had a perfect closing ending, so it was completely unnecessary for a sequel to be made. The reason for this movie to only exists is to give the people who watched the first movie the hope that Quasimodo got the girl he wanted.

Redeeming Qualities

 * 1) Quasimodo finally get a girlfriend, Madellaine, and the romance between the two is done reasonably. The movie gives reasons for her to love him despite his physical appearance.
 * 2) The voice acting is still good thanks to Tom Hulce, Demi Moore, Kevin Kline, Jane Withers, and Charles Kimbrough from the first movie returning for the sequel to reprising their roles.
 * 3) While nowhere near as good as Frollo, Sarousch can be entertaining. Indeed, Sarousch can be seen as the reflection of the image Frollo had from all Gypsies.
 * 4) There are some admittedly good funny moments here and there, such as during the scene where Hugo and Laverne argue at each other, Hugo was saying "Take that..." only for him to get punched in the snout by Laverne, and snuffly said, "Back!".
 * 5) All of the original voice cast is back, with two exceptions: Tony Jay due to character death, and Mary Wickes due to her actual death (Note: Mary Wickes died before she could finish recording her lines as Laverne in the first film, so Jane Withers completed her lines in the first film and took over as the voice of Laverne in this film following Mary Wickes' death).
 * 6) The instrumental score by Carl Johnson, the composer of Gargoyles and Pooh's Grand Adventure: The Search For Christopher Robin, is also good.
 * 7) With the exception of the Gargoyles, and unlike some other Disney sequels, the rest of the returning characters aren't flanderized/dumped on and are mainly faithful to the original incarnations, especially Quasimodo.
 * 8) *Esmeralda is still likable despite, as mentioned earlier, getting very little screen time.
 * 9) *Phoebus is still tolerable for the most part.

Videos
lNmtHGRL5UM A4ciU0zO3YI lzEikE5kX50 hEq54RYXnVQ zjnqURHSxks DyPHzCtPyso LtX3Ky7F5a4 qJNTVEZ-nkw 0foLXGjCA5E q1j7FU8QXu0 sasNTMDRBLU 1_PcHjIkpPk