User:Stephenfisher2001/sandbox/Worse

Spider-Man 3 is a 2007 superhero film that is pretty much hated by the Spider-Man fans, especially the audiences. Fan of the franchise anywhere has torn this film to kingdom come. But guess what? I don't think it's the worst Spider-Man movie ever made, or not the worse superhero film ever, and fans of the series can say what they want. In other words, I still like Tobey Maguire's Spider-Man, even Tom Holland's Spider-Man series. And I kinda enjoyed it, and no, I seriously didn't like the dancing part, but I still have neutral feelings over the third film. But here are many superhero films that have been given far worse over the years. Because Spider-Man 3 is basically a cakewalk compared to these films.

Number #
Superman IV: The Quest for Peace



This movie sucks! Superman IV is basically The Rise of Skywalker of the Superman franchise, and the special effects are even worse, and it has horrible acting, and Nuclear Man is a HORRIBLE villain, and it's basically a World War III avoidable film, but not in a good way. F*CK THIS MOVIE! CANON FILMS SHOULD GO TO HELL!

Number #
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice



What's the point of making a superhero film that a superhero going against another superhero is a good idea? Well, guess what? The whole point of the rivalry between Batman and Superman, and what made their fight so iconic in the comics, is their opposing ideals and views of the world; Batman is dark and cynical, while Superman is light and hopeful. However, in this movie, both Batman and Superman are dark gloomy vigilantes with questionable morality, which completely destroys the point of their rivalry and makes it feel forced. THIS RELATIONSHIP OF BATMAN AND SUPERMAN IS FLANDERIZING INTO A HATED-RELATIONSHIP, WHICH THIS MOVIE SHOULDN'T EXIST!

Number #
Catwoman



Catwoman is just a horrible spin-off to the Batman films, and it almost had nothing to do with the character it's based on (to the point in a case similar to Godzilla 1998 where the movie was referred to as CINO (Catwoman In-Name Only) and cashing into a trend way too late. The film has almost no connection with the Batman anti-heroine character of the same name. If anything, it feels more like a gender-swapped (and animal-swapped) version of The Crow. It has lack of continuity that also consists of a forgettable setting that isn't even in Gotham City.

Number #
Fant4stic



Fantastic Four has crossed the line, and it's one of the WORST Marvel films of all time, and the only reason the movie was made was so that 20th Century Fox could hold onto the Fantastic Four film franchise and not lose the rights to Marvel Studios/Disney, and it shows. The movie seems as if it's ashamed of its source material, and just to drive the point home, the name "Fantastic Four" is NEVER mentioned on-screen AT ALL.

The character design for The Thing is horrible. The Thing doesn't even wear pants like in his previous incarnations. It could reasonably be argued that even the Roger Corman film's version of The Thing looks better than this one. Doctor Doom on the other hand looks like some sort of melted plastic toy that was put in a microwave rather than a scientist wearing a metallic suit. He's also nothing short of a complete, total and utter monster, contrasting his tragic villain characterization from the comics gravely. Multiple reviewers have noted that Doctor Doom looks like a crash test dummy.

The movie also takes itself far too seriously and is very dark, which is a far cry from the comics and even from the previous movies. It aspires to become, to quote Trank himself, a "David Cronenberg superhero" movie. It does feature body horror akin to The Fly and stars super-powered people, but fails miserably in combining them due to the horror film theme not fitting well with the Fantastic Four characters. It hurted 20th Century Fox so much to the point that it goes purchased by Disney.

Number #
Son of the Mask



The first Mask film was okay to me, and I was also neutral to this one too, although it does have funny moments, but this film is UGH. It contradicts the lore of the franchise, in the original comic books and one of the deleted scenes from the first movie, it implied that Odin punished Loki, took his powers and put them inside the mask, here however Loki created the mask himself to cause mischief around the world. It has horrible acting that ruins the talents of its all-star cast. Jamie Kennedy gives a really bad performance in the film and sounds like all of his dialogue is very whiny. Also, after the reception of the movie, it caused Jamie Kennedy to hate movie critics and also almost ruined his career.

None of the parts are funny, only relying on gross-out humor and toilet humor. It has horrific CGI effects. The worst examples are on Alvey and Otis (while wearing the mask), also they look worse than in the first movie. Worst of all, Some DVD and TV versions of this movie literally has a SPERM FERTILIZATION SCENE KEPT IN THE FILM!

Number #
Steel (1997)



Steel is a 1997 superhero film, based on the DC Comics character of the same name, but it has very little do with the comic book Steel, beyond a single shout-out to Superman (and even then, it's because Shaq has that tattoo in real life).

Number #
The Amazing Bulk



The Amazing Bulk is nothing but a rip-off to The Incredible Hulk, the cinematography is so awful, and the CGI is some kind of joke. This is the result of the entire movie being filmed on a green screen.