User:RockyBalboaFan/sandbox/

The Amazing Spider-Man 3 was a proposed sequel to The Amazing Spider-Man 2 originally scheduled for a 2016 release, but pushed back to 2018. But was cancelled after Marvel Studios have a agreement with Sony to bring Spider-Man to the Marvel Cinematic Universe.

Plot
The film, set the events of The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Peter grieves over the death of Gwen and decides to use his blood to revive various people who died while he was still living. As such, Peter would later face off with new villains.

Cast

 * Andrew Garfield as Peter Parker/Spider-Man
 * Shailene Woodley as Mary Jane Watson
 * Dane DeHaan as Harry Osborn/Green Goblin
 * Paul Giamatti as Aleksei Sytsevich/Rhino
 * Felicity Jones as Felicia Hardy/Black Cat
 * Chris Cooper as Norman Osborn
 * TBA as Quentin Beck/Mysterio

Why It Would Have Sucked

 * 1) There would still have been more side plots like The Amazing Spider-Man 2 such as Spider-Man dealing with his former childhood friend, Harry Osborn and the Sinister Six by using his blood to bring back his beloved people and possibly some other side plots with some of the villains too.
 * 2) Speaking of villains there would have been 6 villains in this film, which is double the amount of villains The Amazing Spider-Man 2 had, this would have been a bigger problem with this franchise.
 * 3) The climax could have been a generic "tower fight" sequence and would have tried to rehash the Lizard's plan in the first film.
 * 4) The rest of the Sinister Six could have been either killed off pointlessly, or lived somehow.
 * 5) Norman Osborn would have transformed into a monstrous version of Green Goblin from Marvel's Ultimate Comics, and should have ripped off the Hulk as well.
 * 6) There would have been movies you had to watch first before this film such as The Sinister Six, Venom (which would be part of Sony's Marvel Universe in 2018), The Black Cat, and more villain films Sony could have possibly made, some people would mostly just want to watch The Amazing Spider-Man 3 and would miss out and not understand the story that well.
 * 7) It's pacing would been either slow, rushed or boring enough, and would have the same problem just like The Amazing Spider-Man 2.
 * 8) It would have been the nail to the coffin of Sony keeping the rights of Spider-Man if it weren't with Marvel Studios and Disney keeping that as well.
 * 9) The side plot of using Spider-Man's blood to bring back people is ridiculous and just doesn't feel like a Spider-Man story at all, but feels more like fan-fiction along with being too similar to Wolverine's adamantium.
 * 10) The acting could have suffered the same problem much more from the second film and Spider-Man 3.